Writing Forums

Writing Forums is a privately-owned, community managed writing environment. We provide an unlimited opportunity for writers and poets of all abilities, to share their work and communicate with other writers and creative artists. We offer an experience that is safe, welcoming and friendly, regardless of your level of participation, knowledge or skill. There are several opportunities for writers to exchange tips, engage in discussions about techniques, and grow in your craft. You can also participate in forum competitions that are exciting and helpful in building your skill level. There's so much more for you to explore!

Important Changes to Literary Manuevers (1 Viewer)

gohn67

Senior Member
Quick Summary of Changes to Literary Manuevers

-Instead of using Mentors/Mod exculsively as judges, Literary Manuevers is now open for everyone to judge.

-For directions on how to judge the entries click here: LM Adjudication

-Scores will be sent to me through PM.

-Judging will last one week, to give judges time.


Current List of Judges for LM #7
-sliverwriter
-aprilrain
-Chris Miller
-FollowingShadow
 
Last edited:
S

silverwriter

mkay.

so, it's still out of 20? i thought you said something about it being out of ten...

??

*easily confused*
 

gohn67

Senior Member
lol, to avoid confusion I decided to make it out of 20 again, but I guess that created more confusion. I still need to work out the scoring system for it to be out of ten and I have to alter the guidelines, but at the moment I just want to see how LM6 plays out.
 
S

silverwriter

hehehe. kudos for the effort. i'm glad you took up the cause. thanks for clarifying for me.
 

Pawn

Patron
To throw an oar in, I'll say only that scoring out of ten runs the risk of half the entries getting seven and the other half eight. Though more effort, I picked twenty in an attempt to leave room for accuracy and differentiation. Of course, if you can find a way of making it work well out of ten, for example making the difference in each measurement not absolutely equal (4-5<6-7), I will but congratulate you.
 
I

Ilan Bouchard

When was changing it to ten suggested/implemented? I thought the scoring was doing well, for the most part.
 

gohn67

Senior Member
I'm problem not going to change it, still haven't gotten it to work out, keep running into the problems that Pawn mentioned.
 

Ruben

Senior Member
gohn67 said:
I'm problem not going to change it, still haven't gotten it to work out, keep running into the problems that Pawn mentioned.
Tsk tsk.

And to stay on topic, a wise & clichéd quote would be in place: "Don't fix what isn't broken."
 
Top