Writingforums

Writing Forums is a privately-owned, community managed writing environment. We provide an unlimited opportunity for writers and poets of all abilities, to share their work and communicate with other writers and creative artists. We offer an experience that is safe, welcoming and friendly, regardless of your level of participation, knowledge or skill. There are several opportunities for writers to exchange tips, engage in discussions about techniques, and grow in your craft. You can also participate in forum competitions that are exciting and helpful in building your skill level. There's so much more for you to explore!

Defending Your Work (1 Viewer)

Gavrushka

WF Veterans
I think a problem can arise with a beta when they unilaterally decide they're the writer's salvation, intent on leading them to the promised land. It has happened to me, and there is little more galling than a beta taking the attitude of a school teacher instruction a dim child. - Perhaps this can on occasion lead to writers making less than ideal readers, especially when styles clash, or the beta overestimates their ability.

I've just finished reading my seventh novel for members of this site, and I've yet to come across anyone who felt the urge to defend their work. I did screw up my comments for one, relating them very poorly and caused a fair bit of distress as a result. - I lost sleep over this, as I could have dissuaded a gifted writer from continuing. Luckily that didn't happen.

Seven reads, I think, is enough for the time being, and beta reading can be very draining , not to mention time consuming.

I've only had two people from this site read my work, and I don't think either are active here now. So, rest assured no one will have to defend their work from me for a little while. :p
 

Galen

WF Veterans
Gavruska - you are right to point out some of the drawbacks with beta reading.

I have tried to learn to determine if a beta reader and I could forge a productive relationship early in the process to save time and effort for the both of us.

I have been clumsy with my comments at times, and ended up sounding overly critical. I continue to learn how to state my "issues" or questions of a work I am beta reading in a positive, constructive way.
 

W.Goepner

WF Veterans
Ok I know there is a lot of looking down the nose at writers who defend their work. Why? Do you think you are all knowing and smart enough to KNOW that what they did there was wrong and the only way to fix it is to get rid of it?

Of COURSE not! No when you are BETA reading a writers piece you can see things they cant this is soooo true, but they also see things you can't that is why it is SO valuable to them that they defend them selves. Then together you can find ways of which they can polish their work.

So please my writers, defend your work. NEVER take my word or suggestions as law (or even as speculation) take them as the start of a discussion that will ultimately lead to your triumph.

And my beta readers, expect the same from me.

EDIT: By defending their work I mean to ask the beta reader Why they feel the way they do. Only through follow up questions do I believe a writer will learn how to fix their mistakes and grow. I did not mean they should blatantly tell the beta reader they were wrong. Beta readers are in a position to tell you what a reader doesnt get. It doesnt matter what you think, they will always be right about whether or not it works for them. I am just saying it is important for a writer to ask why.

My editor is a volunteer, he is often telling me, not to explain it to him, but to the reader. My issue with that is, I know what I have written and do not see the confusion. When the reader, beta or otherwise, is reading to help the writer, discussion fosters ideas, ideas which can then be gleaned into the story-line. My editor is doing that also, besides showing me proper English. He sends me a rewrite of a sentence or two along with the offending sentences, thus I can read the differences and make up my mind as to how I want it to read. The fantastic thing about this is he writes it how I mean it and usually I only have to change a word or two. Sometimes I see a thought I had not worked into that section and I add it in and send it back to him for opinion. The unfortunate part being he is a volunteer, it is when he has time to work with it. Seeing as I joined the forum because I have a huge lack of funds and am in need of help I cannot go professional.

I have not offered it up to this group as I am a determined cuss, who fears loosing his work to a underhand. Not that there are any here. It is my fear.
 
Last edited:

W.Goepner

WF Veterans
This thread tells me you're not ready for a beta reader.

The whole point of a beta reader is to tell a writer what they need to hear and not what they want to hear. What the writer does with that is entirely their prerogative. But if a writer has a hissy fit with me and screams, "You don't see what I see!", I'm never being a beta for them again. Why? Because it tells me they don't want to hear the truth. They want to be told their work is awesome. Plus, if you have to show me what I'm supposed to get from reading a particular scene, that scene doesn't work. Period.

People who are ready for beta readers don't need to defend their work. They know it isn't perfect – that's why they're seeking the services of a beta.

Sam that is a blatant statement to throw out for a first sentence. Because this thread is to help people to understand, Why we writers, can use beta readers. Also as you have directed many times do not include me in that "you"re not ready", I want all the help I can get. :)

I will ask all of you who might ever beta for me. If I get Pissy about my work, Slap me. I should be attempting to explain what I am trying to convey and might not be doing a good job of. As I have explained to my editor, I tell you what I want to say in hopes of while I am, I glean my meaning and write it in. Of course he always comes back with "don't tell me tell the reader" and I will say, "help me I am lost", if I am having issues.
 

MamaStrong

Senior Member
Nobody should take anyone else's word or suggestions as law, and discussing problem areas is fine - but if you feel you have to 'defend' your work, you're not ready for a beta. Betas are there to critique, not debate. I've done quite a bit of beta work over the years, and if an author implied my comments were 'wrong', or I 'didn't get it', I learned to just quit. I took my spare time and a lot of effort to give them my opinions and suggestions at no charge, knowing full well (and always telling them) that they were free to take or reject any or all of it. But if they want to whine about how I got it all wrong and convince me of their greatness - yeah, I'm not wasting my time on that. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.


This is very well worded. I haven't had much of my work Beta read, especially by people such as those on this site whom I view as more "professional" than say my friends/family. I'm not quite ready for a "real" Beta yet for the very reason I'm not ready to feel rejection. Still toughening my skin on constructive criticism. I defiantly stand behind my work of course, but also feel like I need to hire an editor.

My friend is over visiting and trying to talk to me, so this may seem like babble. I apologize. :)
 

A_Jones

Senior Member
W. Goepner, Thank you. I am glad at least you know what I mean. I know many here believe otherwise, but the truth is when you ask someone to help you with your work, they shouldnt tell you they wont help you they way you want them to. As a writer it is very hard to see how what you are doing is incorrectly coming across. So when your editor or a beta reader tells you an area doesnt work you need to talk to them about it to see what exactly didnt you say correctly and the only way of doing that is to explain what you WANTED to say there. Then, together you will make your work more beautiful than it ever was.
 

Smith

The Fox
Senior Member
Would it be fair to say that a beta reader, in general, is a subjective opinion? Aside from grammar or spelling rules.

What I mean, is let's say there is a scene in my story that for Reader 1 doesn't "work". In my opinion, they missed something. But I still take that advice into consideration. However, then let's say Reader 2 comes along and also says the same thing. Now I'm thinking, "Okay, more than likely there is a problem here. Let's take another look." Then the last reader confirms I do indeed need to go back and fix it, because just like the first reader said, it actually doesn't work.

The point I'm trying to make, is I'm thinking it'd be more advantageous for the writer to have as many sets of eyes as possible. Whereas one person may not have got any emotion out of scene x, a few others may have thought it was okay, or even good. So long as all parties involved keep an open mind, and the writer is willing to respectfully discuss (feel like that's a better word than defend) comments made by the beta-ers, I don't think anybody will have their time wasted. And, I think the process will be even more beneficial for the writer's understanding.

Basically, it's a delicate balance of knowing when to shut-up and listen, consider advice that may be good, or have a back-bone and politely disagree. Really a case-by-case basis.

Also, the writer needs to know how to ask the right questions to get the most out of the learning experience, as A-Jones mentioned.
 
Last edited:

T.S.Bowman

CoF Challenge Host
WF Veterans
Asking to receive more information is different than defending your work.

A completely different animal, indeed.

There have been several instances where something I have written doesn't "feel" right to one or two people, but one or two others find it to be perfectly fine.

The key to gathering more information from those it doesn't work for is finding out, to the best of your abilities, why it doesn't. Those are the people you should be concerned with.
 

W.Goepner

WF Veterans
Ok I know there is a lot of looking down the nose at writers who defend their work. Why? Do you think you are all knowing and smart enough to KNOW that what they did there was wrong and the only way to fix it is to get rid of it?

Of COURSE not! No when you are BETA reading a writers piece you can see things they cant this is soooo true, but they also see things you can't that is why it is SO valuable to them that they defend them selves. Then together you can find ways of which they can polish their work.

So please my writers, defend your work. NEVER take my word or suggestions as law (or even as speculation) take them as the start of a discussion that will ultimately lead to your triumph.

And my beta readers, expect the same from me.

EDIT: By defending their work I mean to ask the beta reader Why they feel the way they do. Only through follow up questions do I believe a writer will learn how to fix their mistakes and grow. I did not mean they should blatantly tell the beta reader they were wrong. Beta readers are in a position to tell you what a reader doesnt get. It doesnt matter what you think, they will always be right about whether or not it works for them. I am just saying it is important for a writer to ask why.

Now that you have added the EDIT, you make a point, which stands to reason, why defend, when you intend for the beta reader to state there opinion? It is like my feelings when I had a person state, NO adverbs. (Maybe not that bluntly, but that is how I took it) Adverbs the ones ending in, ly? Anyway.

I used three in one paragraph, in the first chapter, attempting to describe the tender actions of my MC after being away from his spouse for a while. Though I felt they, (the reader) were wrong, I changed it. There are times when a soft touch or gentle movement needs to be gently enhanced. I do agree where there is an overabundance of these words one should consider revising.

What bothers me is when you, the writer, try to explain why or how you were thinking, the reader remarks that you are coming off snippy, as I had one do once.
 

Sam

General
Patron
Sam that is a blatant statement to throw out for a first sentence. Because this thread is to help people to understand, Why we writers, can use beta readers. Also as you have directed many times do not include me in that "you"re not ready", I want all the help I can get. :)

It may be blatant, but that doesn't make it any less true.

I have been a beta reader for numerous people, and they in return have done the same for me, with the stated proviso that the author is the ultimate arbiter of what s/he does or does not use from each beta's comments. If I disagree with what a beta has said, I don't argue with them. If they're confused with a scene, I don't try to explain it to them. I take what they've said, mine it for quality comments that I agree with, and I thank the person for taking time out of their busy schedule to help me.

I do not throw a hissy fit. Period. I do not defend my work. Period. Those are the actions of someone who has not yet grown a thick enough skin to seek the services of a beta reader, hence my original point. If a beta has said something I don't understand, I ask them to clarify their meaning. If they do not like something in the book, I ask them to explain why. I don't throw a temper tantrum and scream, "You don't see what I see!"

If you're going to seek out beta readers, be prepared to receive negative comments; understand that they are not an affront to you as an author; use them to help strengthen your piece; discard the ones that you do not agree with; thank the person for helping you; offer to beta-read a piece of their work in the future, should they wish to avail of your services; and act like a professional in all aspects of the relationship.
 

TJ1985

Senior Member
I see the beta reader as being a first chance to see how the work performs. I can disagree with the beta reader all I want, but if the story I wanted to tell isn't told so that a beta "gets it," I assume that I failed in my attempt. Unless you pick really dumb betas, a failure is a failure. If I had to go back and explain myself three or four times, it would tell me that the writing or the story (or both) were flawed. A beta reader is, in my mind, never wrong. That's a harsh statement, but I believe it. If someone reads a story and doesn't get it, that tells me that I need a second opinion. If the second opinion agrees with the first, I need to go back to the drawing board and make it better. If a reader doesn't understand something, and a different reader also doesn't understand it, the flaw doesn't lie with the reader.

I've beta read for a person in this forum, one novel was 180+ pages, the other 220+ for a running total of 400 pages. After I read the first novel we touched base and did a notes dump. I had never beta read, and I didn't think to ask about how deeply he wanted me to go, I just went. I pointed out everything that didn't work, sneaky SPAG, continuity, clumsy wording, the works. If it was in there and I noticed it, I told him about it. He was gracious and grateful. He asked a few questions, I answered them, he asked for clarification of a couple points in my notes, I provided it. I kept my comments specifically relative to the piece, and I believe he appreciated that.

Had he, after I'd read 180 pages for him, chosen to bite my head off I would have demonstrated my skill as a profanitist, and I would likely email him from time to time so I could pick up where I left off. That's my personality: I'll try to move hell uphill to help you, but if you take my help and then throw it back in my face... Don't waste your time or mine trying to get another milliliter of help from me. I beta read his longer novel, did the same as before, and if he emailed or PM'ed me and asked me to beta a 500 page piece he'd been working on, I'd do it in a heartbeat without hesitation.

The moral of the story is a simple one: Treat your beta readers as you like, and repay their efforts as you please. If someone points out a pinhole in your masterpiece, tell them how stupid they are and demean them for not understanding. However, if you choose this method you should know that you'll go through a lot of beta readers. You'll also have more difficulty finding new beta readers once the rumor gets around of how you treat them. Demeaning or arguing with a reader doesn't fix a broken story, but editing/rewriting does.
 

Kyle R

WF Veterans
Interesting discussion!

I try to be honest and encouraging when I offer reader feedback. Nowadays, whenever I offer suggestions, I make sure to include a disclaimer making it clear that anything I say, as a reader, should be ignored or discounted if the author feels any of the suggestions don't work for them. The author, after all, is the creator.

I also think, as a reader, it's just as important to point out what works as it is to point out what needs work. Sometimes finding only flaws can taint the feedback with a negative slant.

If, as a writer, I'm only told of my flaws, then I might assume there's nothing I'm doing well.

However, if you tell me my flaws and the things I'm doing well, I'll have a better idea of what I should work on and what I should continue doing.

Lastly, I feel, as a reader, that all my feedback is purely subjective. Meaning, it's all just my personal opinion. Just because something might not work for me, that doesn't mean it's bad or that it even needs fixing. This is why I believe phrases like "to me", "for me", and "in my opinion" go a long way when offering feedback.


So, to me, the best advice for writers is: be grateful for well-intentioned feedback. Don't argue. And reserve the right to make your own creative decisions. If some feedback you receive doesn't jive with what you're going for, feel free to ignore it.

And, again (to me) the best advice for readers is: be honest about what doesn't work for you, be encouraging about what does work for you, and remember that your feedback is not creative law—it's only your personal opinion. :encouragement:
 
Last edited:

Smith

The Fox
Senior Member
It is okay to discuss points with a beta reader for the better understanding of all parties, but not argue over them.

I think that is what was meant by "defending". Poor word choice maybe, but I still agree.
 

W.Goepner

WF Veterans
It may be blatant, but that doesn't make it any less true.

I have been a beta reader for numerous people, and they in return have done the same for me, with the stated proviso that the author is the ultimate arbiter of what s/he does or does not use from each beta's comments. If I disagree with what a beta has said, I don't argue with them. If they're confused with a scene, I don't try to explain it to them. I take what they've said, mine it for quality comments that I agree with, and I thank the person for taking time out of their busy schedule to help me.

I do not throw a hissy fit. Period. I do not defend my work. Period. Those are the actions of someone who has not yet grown a thick enough skin to seek the services of a beta reader, hence my original point. If a beta has said something I don't understand, I ask them to clarify their meaning. If they do not like something in the book, I ask them to explain why. I don't throw a temper tantrum and scream, "You don't see what I see!"

If you're going to seek out beta readers, be prepared to receive negative comments; understand that they are not an affront to you as an author; use them to help strengthen your piece; discard the ones that you do not agree with; thank the person for helping you; offer to beta-read a piece of their work in the future, should they wish to avail of your services; and act like a professional in all aspects of the relationship.

Thank you Sam, that is a nice clarification of what I thought you said and what you meant.

I am working with a person from the forums here, they are reading over my one complete story. They are not only beta reading for me they are editing it also. I will admit I have very bad grammar habits, and they are busy pointing out many to me. Because I know my SPaG is terrible, I cannot fault them for the corrections.

When they have confusion with a spot in the story, I write it to them and explain where or why it is as it is. This gives me a opportunity to think about what I am trying to say to the reader, hopefully giving me insight as to how I can change or improve it. Quite often I leave it as is, because later in the story it is explained. I have many times sent my comments to my beta reader only to have them tell me not to explain it to them but to the reader. Where they have confusion in a area and I explain it to them, they might tell me to use what I explained to them in that spot. Some times I have to ask them to expand on what it is they are not getting, then I can see it from their view point and scratch out a fix.

I know we as writers use many different methods to achieve our goals in writing or completing a story, I would say as much as the beta reader has ways they view a scene our storys. I know what I do is not what someone else would. I also know when I ask advice of others they can only give me what they see in what I attempt to write. Quite often when I go reading through the forums, I have to remind myself that what I am looking at, is only words on a page and any emotion I see is actually what I put there.
 

W.Goepner

WF Veterans
Interesting discussion!

I try to be honest and encouraging when I offer reader feedback. Nowadays, whenever I offer suggestions, I make sure to include a disclaimer making it clear that anything I say, as a reader, should be ignored or discounted if the author feels any of the suggestions don't work for them. The author, after all, is the creator.

I also think, as a reader, it's just as important to point out what works as it is to point out what needs work. Sometimes finding only flaws can taint the feedback with a negative slant.

If, as a writer, I'm only told of my flaws, then I might assume there's nothing I'm doing well.

However, if you tell me my flaws and the things I'm doing well, I'll have a better idea of what I should work on and what I should continue doing.

Lastly, I feel, as a reader, that all my feedback is purely subjective. Meaning, it's all just my personal opinion. Just because something might not work for me, that doesn't mean it's bad or that it even needs fixing. This is why I believe phrases like "to me", "for me", and "in my opinion" go a long way when offering feedback.


So, to me, the best advice for writers is: be grateful for well-intentioned feedback. Don't argue. And reserve the right to make your own creative decisions. If some feedback you receive doesn't jive with what you're going for, feel free to ignore it.

And, again (to me) the best advice for readers is: be honest about what doesn't work for you, be encouraging about what does work for you, and remember that your feedback is not creative law—it's only your personal opinion. :encouragement:

This is interesting Kyle, I never thought to give a positive response to a area which works. I see where it would help the writer feel confident in what they are doing. I try not to say always what is wrong, but I also try to explain how or why it is not working for me. I even try to offer up my ideas as I see them.

POINT; The person I am beta reading for. They refer to what I see as the mane character, as a Tall Lizard or Dragon, Bipedal humanoid. Then about 2/3rd the way through they give them hair and call them a man. Talk about the mind blower. No where until that point, do they refer to them in that way. I do not think it is intentional but... They just took this character and demeaned them to a sub level from what I was reading them.

Waite a moment I don't think I sent that to them yet.
 

Mesafalcon

Senior Member
A general rule I go by, is if I hear it from one or more beta reader, I throw up a red flag.

The opinion of a single reader of course, is very useful, but it's only one reader.

We really need multiple opinions before we can take something seriously if we don't also immediately agree with what was pointed out.
 

candicame

Senior Member
The goal of any critique is to help you write the book you thought you wrote the first time.

If your betas are telling you that you didn't write the book you thought you wrote- you don't get defensive. You say, "Thanks, that's really gonna help in the rewrite." Because that's the whole point of having beta readers. It's important to set expectations so that they'll be able to help you, but no I would never consider defending my work because if I was going to do that I wouldn't get beta readers or an editor. I'd just sent it out to make its way in the world to stand or fall on its own merit. I'd just start querying. Betas are doing you a favor.

My issue is that I feel like betas don't provide enough feedback, but I've had a really hard time finding betas. That's actually why I joined this forum and I'm starting to feel a little discouraged.

Maybe some people have a lot of experience, but my background's not in creative writing. I've never had anything published. I've never even had any collegiate level, creative writing classes. I don't know anything about this. I need the help. I need to know what readers think, big picture, story level stuff. I don't need to have an opinion about what they think, I just need to know what it is. That is just information that I need. I don't feel like they need or want my feedback on their feedback. I can't imagine they'd possibly care. I need to know how it reads. Without input from me. If they don't get it then they don't get it, but if a lot of people don't get the problem might not be that my art is just beyond their comprehension, it might be that it's just not that good.
 

seigfried007

Senior Member
The goal of any critique is to help you write the book you thought you wrote the first time.

If your betas are telling you that you didn't write the book you thought you wrote- you don't get defensive. You say, "Thanks, that's really gonna help in the rewrite." Because that's the whole point of having beta readers. It's important to set expectations so that they'll be able to help you, but no I would never consider defending my work because if I was going to do that I wouldn't get beta readers or an editor. I'd just sent it out to make its way in the world to stand or fall on its own merit. I'd just start querying. Betas are doing you a favor.

My issue is that I feel like betas don't provide enough feedback, but I've had a really hard time finding betas. That's actually why I joined this forum and I'm starting to feel a little discouraged.

Maybe some people have a lot of experience, but my background's not in creative writing. I've never had anything published. I've never even had any collegiate level, creative writing classes. I don't know anything about this. I need the help. I need to know what readers think, big picture, story level stuff. I don't need to have an opinion about what they think, I just need to know what it is. That is just information that I need. I don't feel like they need or want my feedback on their feedback. I can't imagine they'd possibly care. I need to know how it reads. Without input from me. If they don't get it then they don't get it, but if a lot of people don't get the problem might not be that my art is just beyond their comprehension, it might be that it's just not that good.

Oh my goodness, while I agree with your post, why'd you just commit thread necromancy?

Btw, collegiate level writing classes won't necessarily help you as much as a place like this, which full of actual writers. I've taken several collegiate writing courses from different universities--some specifically devoted to academic writing, others allowing for fiction. Haven't taken any solely devoted to fiction, but I have taken "the fiction path" in every course that allowed for it. While you can pick up tips and tricks from such courses, most of what you get is practice... and you'd probably make better headway tinkering around by yourself anyway.

Actually, instead of trying to resurrect this bad boy from 2014, go ahead and make a new one in writing discussion. This is more a publishing area, and critiques (and taking criticism) isn't a skill publishing has some grand monopoly on. You'll get a lot of relevant feedback and responses that way. Some of the members in this thread aren't active anymore :)
 

Art Man

Senior Member
Ok I know there is a lot of looking down the nose at writers who defend their work. Why? Do you think you are all knowing and smart enough to KNOW that what they did there was wrong and the only way to fix it is to get rid of it?

Of COURSE not! No when you are BETA reading a writers piece you can see things they cant this is soooo true, but they also see things you can't that is why it is SO valuable to them that they defend them selves. Then together you can find ways of which they can polish their work.

So please my writers, defend your work. NEVER take my word or suggestions as law (or even as speculation) take them as the start of a discussion that will ultimately lead to your triumph.

And my beta readers, expect the same from me.

EDIT: By defending their work I mean to ask the beta reader Why they feel the way they do. Only through follow up questions do I believe a writer will learn how to fix their mistakes and grow. I did not mean they should blatantly tell the beta reader they were wrong. Beta readers are in a position to tell you what a reader doesnt get. It doesnt matter what you think, they will always be right about whether or not it works for them. I am just saying it is important for a writer to ask why.

When you wrote "defending your work" I thought you meant copyrights and defense from plaigarism.

You're right about a chance to respond and the need for there being a two way dialogue with the author and beta reader that extends beyond one round. If a beta reader is a good enough critic the author shouldn't feel impelled to ask a whole lot beyond the initial exchange. Of course, if a beta reader isn't specific and detailed and doesn't offer a full explanation to the author and makes ambiguously general comments the author is going to have many questions.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top