Title: The Girl with the Pearl Eyes
Genre: Dystopian, political
Word Count: 76,000
Blurb: Ciego Condenado lives in Fraya, a collectivist country dedicated to pacifism, equality, and honoring the sensitives of all people by restricting all things that might offend. Those who do offend place their fates in the hands of the ruling council of Mastresses and are often shamed out of society or burned alive for their transgressions.
The Fraya people live on the border of a wall built long ago to separate them from Dorma, a country obsessed with religion, individualism, nationalism, and the law of natural hierarchies.
Both sides of the wall strictly forbid fraternity between Frayas and Dormas.
But when Ciego meets and falls in love with Sage, a Dorma whose eyes were removed and replaced with pearls as punishment for a crime against the Dorma religion, Ciego must find bravery to stand up against the things he does not believe in and to fight for his future with Sage.
Think Romeo & Juliet x Anthem x 1984
Audience Description: Preferably politically engaged adults
Expectations: I am cool with feedback in any format. I am mainly looking for macro-level feedback about pacing, world building, and tone. I am also looking for some critiques of the book’s various philosophical/political positions.
Timescale: No requirement. Preferably within 1-3 months
Available Formats: PDF, Word, Google Doc – whatever you want.
Other Information: For genre, I say political, but this is mostly a dystopian story with some elements of black comedy. For those who are familiar with the alt-right YouTube rabbit hole and people like Jordan Peterson, you are pretty much my ultra-specific target audience. The book is allegorical in how it treats modern political issues, but I really want some feedback from politically engaged people, left or right, about how the different political philosophies are portrayed. While the book does take a political position, it’s designed to critique and possibly offend most political positions, so I want some honest feedback on how the critiques are coming across, and namely, where on the political spectrum you think the book falls. That’s really important to me. That being said, if you are willing to read it and simply give feedback on story-specific issues without looking at the political stuff, that’s really appreciated as well!
I still consider myself a poet at heart, so my prose is something I am still working on improving. That being said, I feel good about where this manuscript is, and I am looking forward to any feedback.
Bookmarks