Can "Robert is..." be contracted to "Robert's?" - Page 2

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 63

Thread: Can "Robert is..." be contracted to "Robert's?"

  1. #11
    "Robert's" is an absolutely fine contractions of "Robert is", just as "he's" is an absolutely fine contraction of "he is". Yes, "Robert's" is also used as the possessive form, but it's (it is) not restricted to that.

    To be fair, as a contraction of "Robert is" it's more often used in spoken idiolects than written ones. But to be even more fair, more and more emails and blogs are written using spoken idiolects rather than written ones.

    Either way, it is (it's) still fine.
    "Ideas may seem like gold nuggets, but they're more like seeds. You have to plant them, water them, weed them, nurture them, and watch them grow. Every seed will turn out differently depending on whose garden it lands in." Nickleby, 14/6/2013

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Milwaukee, WI
    After some googling, it seems the hardline is that it's incorrect. However, the more relaxed rules says it's ok, but it's a blurry business as it looks just like the possessive form of a proper noun.

  3. #13
    Context is vital here. There's no way that anyone with a good grasp of English could mistake "Robert's on his way to the shop" for the possessive form of a proper noun. It's certainly frowned upon, but incorrect is a stretch.

    When you break it down into the third-person pronoun, it becomes easier to understand why it isn't incorrect: "He's on his way to the shop". Or: "Dad's on his way home". You can't mistake those for possessive nouns either.
    Hidden Content

    Hidden Content

    "One morning I shot an elephant in my pyjamas. How he got into my pyjamas I'll never know." ~ Groucho Marx.

    "It is better to be feared than loved, if one cannot be both". ~ Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince.

    "A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer". ~ Bruce Lee.

    "In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's mind there are few". ~ Shunryu Suzuki.

    "Give a man a mask and he will show you his true face". ~ Oscar Wilde.

    "He who learns but does not think is lost; he who thinks but does not learn is in great danger". ~ Confucius.

  4. #14
    Agree - context explains all, so using the contraction for "Robert is" is not incorrect. Now, having said that, I personally wouldn't use it in the narrative of a book, as I feel that should be more formal writing. I would have no problem using it in dialogue, or on a blog, or other more 'informal' formats.
    Has left the building.

  5. #15
    You guys are pretty amazing, you know that? I had no idea I'd get these very cool explanations when I posted this question. So thank you everyone!
    Hidden Content
    The Foibles of the Most Pampered Homeless in the Bay Area

  6. #16
    Add another voice to the "Robert's is a perfectly acceptable contraction of Robert is" crowd.
    "Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing." - Benjamin Franklin

    "I do not over-intellectualize the production process. I try to keep it simple: Tell the damned story." - Tom Clancy

  7. #17
    I would not hesitate to use Robert's in dialogue, or in first person narration if it fit the narrator's character. A bit more about contractions;

    Contractions :: Quick and Dirty Tips
    “Fools” said I, “You do not know
    Silence like a cancer grows
    Hear my words that I might teach you
    Take my arms that I might reach you”
    But my words like silent raindrops fell
    And echoed in the wells of silence : Simon & Garfunkel

    Those who enjoy stirring the chamber-pot should be required to lick the spoon.

    Our job as writers is to make readers dream, to infiltrate their minds with our words and create a new reality; a reality not theirs, and not ours, but a new, unique combination of both.

    Visit Amazon and the Kindle Store to check out Reflections in a Black Mirror, and Chase

    Hidden Content

  8. #18
    Sorry to rain on the parade of those who think it is ok to use Robert's for Robert is but it is grammatically incorrect and the verbal contraction does not apply to Proper nouns. On the subject of grammar, no it isn't just there for guidance to make sure we understand each other. We continually break grammatical rules in spoken speech because we have the advantage of gesture, tone, stress and a number of other vocal factors to make ourselves known,so we can understand each other even when we break grammatical rules. Written language is different of course and grammar exists to clarify whatever we are writing. Every language has its rules of acceptabiiity and in English the genitive 's should be distinct from the contracted 'is' to 's.

  9. #19
    It's a blog. As long as the communication is clear, feel free to break some rules.
    Sleep is for the weak, or sleep is for a week.
    I write about anime and internet culture at Hidden Content

  10. #20
    Contrary to some other opinions here, no you should not use Robert's as a contraction of Robert is. The verbal contraction should not be used with proper nouns and indeed cannot be used if the individual has a name ending in s such as Evans. Evans's would almost certainly confuse a reader.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.