People have sued over stranger, more ludicrous things. I know the 'Ways aren't anything that will ever be mainstream, but I've done all right with commissions and therein lies the rub. If you can't get the rights, get anything you can...Preliminary hearing is later today to see if there are grounds to proceed. And given the fact that she had previously admitted to taking the villanelles in the plagiarism case does not bode well. Still a bit worried, not because I'm unprepared, but because people can be fickle.
There are better ways to do things, especially with writing. The human capacity to create is one of our greatest gifts, I don't understand why some people feel the need to commandeer the work of others. What is behind the reasoning? If it isn't yours, don't take it and then pitch a fit when the rightful owner steps in. This is what entitlement fosters. It is also one of the most fulsome aspects of humanity.
What has me worried is that with the plagiarism case, only the poems directly connected to the Star Socks Fox were required to prove the authorship, roughly about 5% of the entire body of work. This time the project as a whole is required, both the physical and digital copies. Everything is in order, dated, notarized, and authorship verified with copyrights attached. But no one has ever seen everything. Even as much as I post for critique...Tip of the iceberg. I specialize in chaos theory and butterfly effect with my work, no one sees the multitude of threads that crisscross and intersect in a thriving web of nonsense. The level of detail straddles the line between painful and insane.
I have a pretty good idea of what her ploy is about and it isn't just the commissions...:distress: My working manuscript will be out of my hands and that terrifies me.