I am working on a historical romance novel.
My heroine is sort of a "ruined" debutante, as she was practically engaged to a Duke when the guy literally ran off and married another lady. A year later she really was engaged, when her fiance was caught in a compromising position with a society girl and was forced to marry her instead. So when the story picks up, she is trying to rebuild her reputation. She's embarrassed, and she's heart broken.
When I originally started the first chapter, she was having a weak moment and was coming down pretty hard on herself. The problem was that the reader didn't really find out until chapter 3 why she was feeling that way. Usually novels sort of leave it up to the story to explain the history which is what I did, but when I was rereading, she came across as pitiful and unlikable; not at all the strong female lead that has been through a lot, which is what I was going for. I'm afraid that a reader wouldn't even get through chapter one before going "Wow, this is a downer" and putting the book away (as this type of novel usually involves a spunky, energetic heroine).
So I went back and added a few pages to the beginning, which kind of summarizes her side of the story and goes into what she has been through since the ordeal happened (two years prior to the beginning of the book). After reading it again, I feel like that put a more positive shine on the character, but my sister (who is my creative outlet) thinks I may have revealed too much too soon.
So I guess I am having a hard time finding a balance between making sure the reader understands the character enough to care about her and find her interesting, and keeping some of the history a mystery to reveal later in the story.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote





Bookmarks