Brace yourselves.
I realize that good story progression is largely (not completely, but largely) a matter of opinion. But, I guess thats what I'm asking for, opinions...
I am faced with a story I am writing, and the decision of whether to
A.) post the ending chapter at the beginning and have the book read like a collection of short stories around a central building theme.
Pros: The ending chapter is far more exciting than the chapter that would go first chronologically, and I believe it would hook a reader's interest more quickly and deeply.
Cons: It would be a little confusing- and I'm afraid jumping backwards might irritate some people.
I have had both good and bad experiences as a reader with authors 'backing up'. I know how I would want to read it, and how I wouldn't want to read it, and I don't think I'm terribly abnormal- I think I could do it.
or
B.) Having the chapters occur in chronological order as is fairly standard (as far as I've seen) for a mystery/horror/suspense novel.
Pros: Easy, and probably what most readers are expecting.
Cons: It won't have the feel of a short story collection, and when I jump from following one character to another it will feel just as disjointed.
Part of my problem is, I have two endings I really like and option A lets me use both, BUT option B seems less likely to get thrown out by an editor.
My question boils down to, I think, if the first chapter was exciting enough, would you as a reader be willing to back up for the sake of seeing how it all came to this or would you rather be mildly interested at first and see the pressure build?
I'm not an action writer, I can't start exciting and carry it through.
I think I should just make "Did any of that make sense?" my signature.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote








Bookmarks