Writers Forum - WritingForums.com Home Rules FAQ Members Groups Calendar Gallery Search
» Sign Up «

Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
  Search Forums
Lit.Org - Bootcamp for writers. Post your work and other writers review it, it's that easy.

Advanced Search



Go Back   Writers Forum - WritingForums.com > Writing > Writers' Resources
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Writers' Resources Links to and discussion of writing related sites and handy resources, including but not limited to publishers, on and offline magazines, contests and guides.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-17-2008, 03:31 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 16
Michael Allan is on a distinguished road
Question Political Slogan

(apologies for cross-posting)

I'm an open-source developer working in the area of social and collaborative media. (Hello again.) I am seeking advice on the wording of a political slogan.

By way of explanation, I've been working with project textbender to develop recombinant text. It's a collaborative medium for poetry, creative writing, musical composition, and so forth. But it also has socio-political applications. These are being explored in a sister project, Votorola:
http://zelea.com/project/votorola/home.xht
I am working on a political slogan (of sorts), in order to express the purpose of 'open elections'. Here is what I have, so far:

Quote:
Governments are machines, and businesses are machines. They ought to be controlled. But our communities are *not* machines. They ought *not* to be controlled, ought not to be exposed to political power or economic manipulation.
(Phew!) This summarizes the design purpose of open elections, well enough. It also roughly paraphrases Jurgen Habermas's critical theory of society (communicative action), which happens to inform the design. But, as it stands, it's not very inspiring... Are there any wordsmiths who could help? Can anyone suggest improvements?

(Note: The collaborative tools under development for policy and legislative drafting will also be applicable to creative art. As they're developed, they'll be released to creative artists, too.)

What do you think?
Michael Allan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0


 
You are NOT Logged In.
User Name:

Password



Newsletter

Subscribe to Majestic
the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
Email:


Related Links

Link to Us:
Writing Forums - Discussions for Writers