Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will
be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
| Writers' Resources Links to and discussion of writing related sites and handy resources, including but not limited to publishers, on and offline magazines, contests and guides. |
12-04-2007, 10:39 AM
|
#31
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C
I see your point, but I think if the thread remains intact then the information - both sides of the discussion - is there for all to see and judge for themselves.
And as NS says, censorship stinks.
|
And I understand what you are saying as well, but allowing this garbage would be comparable to allowing publishamericadotcom to advertise on your site. |
|
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 10:46 AM
|
#32
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South-east UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,590
|
Maybe so, but to delete it completely would be to deny any prospective mark to walk into an arrangement unaware of the pitfalls, and indeed (if Katarina/Kimbro is legitimate and we missed something, however unlikely that may be) would deny Kimbro the right to reply.
|
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 10:47 AM
|
#33
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Location, Location
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,216
|
We're not allowing it. We're challenging it.
__________________
Thoughtcrime does not entail death. Thoughtcrime IS death.
|
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 10:55 AM
|
#34
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C
Maybe so, but to delete it completely would be to deny any prospective mark to walk into an arrangement unaware of the pitfalls, and indeed (if Katarina/Kimbro is legitimate and we missed something, however unlikely that may be) would deny Kimbro the right to reply.
|
It is a total catch 22!
Regardless of what some of us know about this kind of BS, he/she/it will undoubtedly suck in a couple of "Writers". |
|
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 02:23 PM
|
#35
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 286
|
Hey Katarina,
If I write the word 'mushroom' 80 thousand times and call it a book, can I still post it on your website?
Don't worry, I'll still pay you 100 bucks. I just want to get my work onto the editor's desk. My greatest book ever! "Eighty Thousand Mushrooms - a novel"
These other people are giving you the benefit of the doubt, but I say that if you don't know that you're cheating people then you've got a double digit IQ.
CF
Last edited by valeca : 12-04-2007 at 02:52 PM.
Reason: Unnecessary flaming
|
|
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 05:15 PM
|
#36
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South-east UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,590
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by duck
It is a total catch 22!
Regardless of what some of us know about this kind of BS, he/she/it will undoubtedly suck in a couple of "Writers".
|
It's not catch 22 - you don't expose poor practice by ignoring it or hiding it, but by exposing it. And yes, she may suck in other writers, but I doubt it will be anyone who reads this thread. Job done. |
|
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 05:51 PM
|
#37
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C
It's not catch 22 - you don't expose poor practice by ignoring it or hiding it, but by exposing it. And yes, she may suck in other writers, but I doubt it will be anyone who reads this thread. Job done.
|
You under-estimate the power of stupidity. |
|
|
|
|
12-04-2007, 09:53 PM
|
#38
|
|
Wordsmith
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On islands
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,031
|
Amen. Always err on the side of permitting rather prohibiting in such matters. I don't think anybody reading this will blunder into that site (unless they are REALLY oblivious and have it coming) whereas they might have it this thread wasn't here.
In addition to all the publishers salivating to get their hands on MS's from people who have to pay big bucks to get them out there, I would like to see where this "author" has been published.
|
|
|
|
|
12-05-2007, 12:40 AM
|
#39
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South-east UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,590
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lin
I would like to see where this "author" has been published.
|
Home Business Online |
|
|
|
|
12-05-2007, 09:37 AM
|
#40
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C
|
From that site, Q & A at the bottom. I almost fell out of my chair laughing:
Should I expect to pay to become an affiliate
Never - If a company attempts to charge you to join their affiliate program - run like hell.
Hey Kimbro the same is true in publishing! |
|
|
|
|
12-05-2007, 10:01 AM
|
#41
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Earth... for now.
Posts: 430
|
Why should I pay $100 for your "Members Only" area when I can get better information out of my Writer's Digest two-year subscription?
__________________
"The writer you envy today will probably have reason to envy you tomorrow." - Orson Scott Card
Last edited by Mr Sci Fi : 12-05-2007 at 01:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
12-05-2007, 10:44 AM
|
#42
|
|
Wordsmith
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On islands
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,031
|
That FAQ is pretty hilarious, all right. Making money with "affiliates" is on a par with raising chinchillas.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM. Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
|
|
Newsletter |
 |
|
Subscribe to Majestic
the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
|
|
Link to Us: 
|
|
