Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will
be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
| Writers' Resources Links to and discussion of writing related sites and handy resources, including but not limited to publishers, on and offline magazines, contests and guides. |
11-21-2007, 06:28 PM
|
#16
|
|
Addict
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Redmond, WA
Gender: Male
Posts: 171
|
Just to show that "always" is a dangerous word to use (see above), I was having breakfast with Dan and Sandy Gookin one morning (Dan was the guy who created the whole "... For Dummies" deal)...
We seriously talked about him paying me money to publish a new book he'd written. Note that at this point Dan's books had probably sold, oh geez, something in excess of 10 million copies. Shoot, for all I know, in excess of 20 million copies.
Was Dan being conned by a vanity press? No, of course not! Dan was considering essentially a joint venture where rather than getting 10% or whatever, he'd get half of the profit....
Moral: Any multiple choice answer with the word "always" is (almost) "always" wrong...
|
|
|
11-22-2007, 04:51 AM
|
#17
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik Buchanan
And on another note, DKL88, I find it difficult to believe that you are who you say you are. If you were actually a 19 year old who had published a book, you would have been trumpeting the value of your current publisher, unless that, too, was a vanity press that charged you money to print.
In fact, because the sentence you used was "my first local book," it suggests that you have published more than one. And given that a real publisher generally takes about 2 to 3 years to get a book on the shelf, either you went to a vanity press or you first got a publishing deal at age 15. The first is more likely than the second.
You can refute this by providing the name of this vanity press you are recommending, which you have yet to do despite being asked, as well as the title of the book that you claimed to have published, and the publisher of that one.
|
16 by Sutton Publishing actually, Criminal Wirral and Wirral Tragic Tales. Their recent change in management has forced both some staff and authors to 'jump ship' as it were.
I'm not here to argue, just saying there's a new publishers, name to be decided, looking for authors who think they can sell alone with a higher royalty percentage than the average 10%.
So agrumentative 
Last edited by Mike C : 11-22-2007 at 05:04 AM.
Reason: Stupidly and unnecessarily large font.
|
|
|
11-22-2007, 05:03 AM
|
#18
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South-east UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleCPA
Just to show that "always" is a dangerous word to use (see above), I was having breakfast with Dan and Sandy Gookin one morning (Dan was the guy who created the whole "... For Dummies" deal)...
We seriously talked about him paying me money to publish a new book he'd written. Note that at this point Dan's books had probably sold, oh geez, something in excess of 10 million copies. Shoot, for all I know, in excess of 20 million copies.
Was Dan being conned by a vanity press? No, of course not! Dan was considering essentially a joint venture where rather than getting 10% or whatever, he'd get half of the profit....
Moral: Any multiple choice answer with the word "always" is (almost) "always" wrong...
|
I hear what you're saying, but I didn't use the word 'always', I said generally. However this venture so far is a carbon-copy of many others in the UK, and it's not good. Aside from anything else some of the math (or all of the stated math) is flawed, suggesting selling 100 books at £10 - $20 - each to break even. At a 50% royalty (or discount if you're selling them yourself, as indeed you'd have to) means you'd have to sell 200 to break even. Most vanity published novels don't ever sell that many. Add in cost of sales and you'd probably have to sell 300-400. Then consider that mainstream 'hot' titles in the UK sell in bookstores (before they're discounted) for an average of £7.99. Nobody's going to buy a book out of the trunk of a car by an unknown for 25% more than they can buy a best-seller.
This also suggests they're charging the author £5 - $10 - a book to print. That makes Lulu look like a far better prospect.
As we've agreed before, self-publishing has it's place, and if I had a non-fic computer-related book to market, I'd consider offering you money too, but this is a different deal. The intention may be good - I'm not suggesting they're actually out to steal from authors - but they're offering a really bad deal.
|
|
|
11-22-2007, 08:54 AM
|
#19
|
|
Addict
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKL88
16 by Sutton Publishing actually, Criminal Wirral and Wirral Tragic Tales. Their recent change in management has forced both some staff and authors to 'jump ship' as it were.
|
Thank you for listing your previous publisher and your books, and I withdraw my comment about disbelieving that you were an author.
Did Sutton Press (now Tempus Publications) also require cash for publishing?
I stand by my definition of a vanity press. As I said before, if you wish to go that way you can, but unless you have a very good product and are a good marketer, your chances of breaking even are slim.
Money always flows to the author.
Last edited by Erik Buchanan : 11-22-2007 at 09:01 AM.
|
|
|
11-22-2007, 09:15 AM
|
#20
|
|
Scribe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Gender: Female
Posts: 75
|
Alright everyone, time to calm down. Stick a sucker in your mouth, and stop fighting. Lol. Just playin'
No I completely agree, if my work is so good, why am I paying to get it published?
When I was 14 I was offered by several different vanity press publishers to get my work published. And at age 14 I figured something was up. So beware people always look good till you wake up in bed with them the next morning.
All my best, but none of my good stuff!
__________________
*** correction: Writing is about individuality, breaking the rules, testing new grounds, listening to ourselves. That's why we do it, to show we are individuals, we are human and because everyone's idea deserves a chance, even if you don't think so.
"Truth is complex, truth has many points of view"
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 PM. Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
|
|
Newsletter |
 |
|
Subscribe to Majestic the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
|
|
Link to Us:
|
|