Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will
be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
| Tips & Advice Share your tips, tricks and advice. |
04-08-2008, 01:27 PM
|
#1
|
|
Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 139
|
Was/Were
Hello everybody!
There has been a little dispute going on about a grammar problem, and now I'm totally confused!
Here's the sentence:
The crowd of peasants, merchants and artisans was (were) ominously quiet as it (they) poured out of Anradem's alleys into its great Market Square.
Should it be "was" and "it" because it correlates with "crowd," which is singular? Or should it be "were" and "they" because "peasants, merchants and artisans" are plural?
Thank you in advance for your help!
Claudia
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 01:41 PM
|
#2
|
|
Best Seller
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Gender: Female
Posts: 742
|
I'm not entirely sure of the answer, but I believe you could eliminate the problem with the addition of 'consisted' and some other minor changes to lessen confusion.
"The crowd consisted of peasants, merchants and artisans, and all were ominously quiet as they poured out of Anradem's alleys into its great Market Square."
__________________
All my best thoughts were stolen by the ancients. Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 02:29 PM
|
#3
|
|
Scribe
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brighton, UK.
Gender: Female
Posts: 76
|
You know what I'm going to say, lol, but I thought I might as well plant my soapbox firmly in the 'was' camp in this thread too.
Did a little googling to check whether I was mistaken on this point, but I've decided that I wasn't. It is explained quite well in one of the sites I found:
The first and most important rule in subject verb agreement is that the verb must agree with the intended number of the subject.
To accomplish that task, follow two occasionally not so simple tasks.- Identify the real subject
- Determine whether subject is singular or plural
The first step is often made difficult by phrases and/or sentence structure that work to obscure the true subject.
Prepositional phrases are one of the main culprits in the misidentification of the true subject of the clause. Remember, objects cannot be subjects, so the object of a preposition cannot be a subject of a clause.- The group of protesters is blocking the entrance to the building.
- OF is a preposition; therefore, PROTESTERS is the object of the preposition. GROUP is the subject of the sentence and it is singular.
(Link to the site in question here.)
As you can see, the example given is quite similar to your sentence, at least in terms of the singular subject (group) with the plural objects (protesters/peasants, merchants and artisans.)
I will concede, however, that treating singular collective nouns, such as group/team etc., as plurals is fairly common, probably increasingly so. Therefore, you could probably get away with saying 'were' and it wouldn't necessarily sound wrong. To some people it would probably sound more natural, although it would not be grammatically correct.
I hope this clarifies rather than confuses the issue...
__________________
Written a publishable short story/poem? Why not submit it to the Oddville Press? Click here for more details.
Nighttime is really the best time to work. All the ideas are there to be yours because everyone else is asleep.
Catherine O'Hara
Last edited by NightOwl : 04-08-2008 at 02:40 PM.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 02:40 PM
|
#4
|
|
Mentor
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Location, Location
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,913
|
"Crowd" is singular and therefore the verb and pronoun should be singular.
__________________
Born naked, helpless, unable to care for himself and completely open-minded, Non Serviam has subsequently surmounted all these difficulties and gone on to become a decently-clothed, self-sufficient, close-minded sod.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 03:24 PM
|
#5
|
|
Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 139
|
I'd rather not write "consisted of" . . . it sounds like overly explaining it. I'll keep the sentence the way it is with the correct grammar.
Thank you all!
Claudia
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 04:01 PM
|
#6
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 248
|
Out of Anradem's alleys, into its great Market Square, poured the omniously quiet crowd of peasants, merchants and artisans.
Problem solved
I think was is right but it don't sound right therefor, re-word, ie the above.
__________________
Any questions? PM me because I may not return to your post again.
Do your part, find a 0 reply post and help them out.
I am what I am and you made me that way.
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 04:10 PM
|
#7
|
|
Adept Writer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Some highway somewhere.
Gender: Male
Posts: 822
|
I have to agree that the subject "crowd" is singular, and the verb should always follow suit. Therefore, "Crowd...was...it."
__________________
"Writing is easy. You only need to stare at a piece of blank paper until your forehead bleeds"--Douglas Adams
|
|
|
04-08-2008, 04:54 PM
|
#8
|
|
Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 139
|
Phurst: thank you for the suggestion. It was a good way of rephrasing the sentence, but unfortunately it doesn't match the context of the paragraph and the meaning of what I'm trying to convey.
Thank you as well, Lost in Some Story.
Claudia
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:22 AM
|
#9
|
|
Profound Writer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,094
|
I think either is correct. 'Crowd' is a singular word with a plural meaning.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 01:59 AM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 9
|
Not really, just because 'crowd' means 'many people' doesn't change the fact it's only one crowd.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 06:34 AM
|
#11
|
|
Profound Writer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,094
|
The sheep that escaped from the field was happy in its new surroundings, the other sheep were pushing each other out of the way as they too tried to find an escape route to greener pastures.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 06:48 AM
|
#12
|
|
Scribe
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brighton, UK.
Gender: Female
Posts: 76
|
The plural of sheep is sheep.
The plural of crowd is crowds.
What is your point?
__________________
Written a publishable short story/poem? Why not submit it to the Oddville Press? Click here for more details.
Nighttime is really the best time to work. All the ideas are there to be yours because everyone else is asleep.
Catherine O'Hara
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 07:00 AM
|
#13
|
|
Addict
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: in a body
Gender: Private
Posts: 144
|
Up to here it might mean only 1 sheep but, from the context, it is clear that there is more than 1 (were, each other, they)
One sheep escaped, the others stayed pushing each other, like life itself.
So,
__________________
"All, all is theft, all is unceasing and rigorous competition in nature; the desire to make off with the substance of others is the foremost - the most legitimate - passion nature has bred into us and, without doubt, the most agreeable one."
Marquis de Sade
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 11:08 AM
|
#14
|
|
Profound Writer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,094
|
I picked a bad example, as Winkash pointed out, I'll try again:
The gaggle of reporters, photographers and onlookers was unusually quiet as it waited for the imminent arrival of Heather Mills, but they were suddenly animated when they realised that she had left by a side entrance, and chased after her to hear another rant against the famous Beatle.
My contention is, and I may well be wrong, that 'was' and 'it', is just as valid as 'were' and 'they'.
|
|
|
04-09-2008, 12:19 PM
|
#15
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Gender: Male
Posts: 350
|
I'm in the "was" camp, as I said in the story thread. You could actually improve the story and eliminate the problem with two sentences.
The large crowd WAS getting drunk and milling around aimlessly. The peasants, merchants and artisan WERE becoming ominous....
Now you have one of each, and everyone is happy. 
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM. Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
|
|
Newsletter |
 |
|
Subscribe to Majestic the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
|
|
Link to Us:
|
|