Quote:
Originally Posted by JP Wagner
that you would seeminly have to write a story with them in mind to get accepted. (which may not be a good thing for writing)
|
I think you hit the nail on the head here. That said, I'm not sure if that's necessarily a bad thing (writing for a particular journal). First of all, if you even have the ability to write for a particular journal, that means you've actually read the journal sufficiently (which you should be doing no matter what, right?), and know the editorial tastes. Which is good.
Sometimes I try to write in the style of a particular authour I admire. Not for any real reason, but just because I feel like it and want to see if I can learn something. Is doing this any different, at the end of the day, than trying to write in a style that will appeal to a particular magazine?
I don't really intend that as a rhetorical question, since I'm curious. I write my first drafts on autopilot most of the time, then go through them more carefully during the editing stages. So if I were to write to a particular magazine, I'd basically have to change my standard process.
As for how many submissions it takes on average to get a short story accepted, I have no idea. I don't really like thinking of statistics like that. If you give a magazine something that's damn good and within the scope of their interests, you could get accepted on your first try. Or if you write something boring, or worse yet write something good but send it to totally wrong markets, you could submit it countless times without any bites.
I wish I was better at targetting my submissions. At times it seems like an even more important skill to have than the writing itself.