Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will
be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
| Tips & Advice Share your tips, tricks and advice. |
12-26-2005, 04:53 PM
|
#1
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 224
|
Point of View
I know this might sound really stupid, but is it okay if most of your story takes place in first person, in which the main character tells the story and then at a different location with different characters the story takes place in third person? At the end of my story, both of the sets of characters meet and it is back in first person. The main character then gives their opinons and such about the happenings. Should I change it all to third person or what? Help!
|
|
|
12-26-2005, 05:02 PM
|
#2
|
|
Ink Slinger
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,549
|
I would think it is OK. Does the 1st person character know about the 3rd person stuff or is it happening 'off-stage' to him, so to speak? If it's not involving the 1st person one, how does he/she find out about it? Is ti something someone tells him/her or s/he reads perhaps?
I think if both are written well & you don't strand the reader when you make the switch it should eb fine. Once you have your reader gripped in your narrative you can do lots to them & they will stay with you if the story is written well & holds their interest
__________________
*He has never been known to use a word that might send a reader to the dictionary - William Faulkner (about Ernest Hemingway)
*Poor Faulkner. Does he really think big emotions come from big words? - Ernest Hemingway (about William Faulkner)
*Thank you for sending me a copy of your book; I'll waste no time reading it - Moses Hadas
*He can compress the most words into the smallest idea of any man I know - Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
12-26-2005, 09:22 PM
|
#3
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 224
|
They are in different places, so no, the first character does not know about the other. They have met before, although. The first character goes looking for the other and they meet.
|
|
|
12-26-2005, 09:24 PM
|
#4
|
|
pliable
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Juneau, Alaska
Posts: 12,607
|
Make sure to mark the change somehow. Either use italics for one of th POV's or use an asterisk break (which, apparently, we originally intended to mark POV shifts).
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Drzava
Usually it takes at least 100 [posts] before people start to hate Hodge
|
Science
|
|
|
12-26-2005, 09:24 PM
|
#5
|
|
Scribe
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 77
|
I would say do it, then read it, that is when you will see if it flows right
|
|
|
12-26-2005, 11:29 PM
|
#6
|
|
Profound Writer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: I'm not at liberty to say.
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,004
|
[ThreadHijack] I'm actually doing this same sort of thing in my novel. I was wondering the same thing, but I saw this thread. It's working for me, so far. [/ThreadHijack]
|
|
|
12-26-2005, 11:34 PM
|
#7
|
|
Scribe
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 77
|
i have noticed that in my writing it will look right to me, but as soon as i print it out and look at it i can find the mistakes. It's something about the computer screen where my eyes don't catch certain things.
Another thing that you could do since you said that at first they aren't together, you can have first person and then when they meet up do the third person.
I would also do when you are switching to the other character you should start a new chapter to not get the reader confused. kelly
|
|
|
12-27-2005, 09:30 AM
|
#8
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 224
|
Okay, thanks everyone. I have been using the *****, but I might use chapters, since I haven't divided it into chapters yet. When they meet, however, I don't want it to be in 3rd person because I want it to be in 1st person whenever the main character is present.
|
|
|
12-27-2005, 06:25 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
|
I have to say, although I've seen it done, I don't think it's ever good to switch from first to third in the same work. It just feels inconsistent.
|
|
|
12-27-2005, 08:04 PM
|
#10
|
|
Mentor
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,583
|
I disagree Adienne. I think challenging these kind of conventions is sometimes a very good idea, and a very effective tool.
If it's done well, this could be very good, but it also has the potential to be ham-fisted, so be careful. Consistency is going to be the key. Make sure you mark all the changes in POV the same way.
And, make sure the 1st person sections have a narrative voice that is distinctive from the 3rd person sections. They have different narrators, so they will need to sound different.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gohn
Never take what Talia says seriously.
|
|
|
|
12-27-2005, 08:16 PM
|
#11
|
|
Ink Slinger
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,799
|
In the book "The House of Sand and Fog" it uses three POVs. Two in first person and one in third person. The way it was split up was by chapter. So I don't see any problem with using mulitple POVs like that, just as long as you do it in a way that is not jarring or confusing.
If you kept going back and forth every half a page that would really annoy me, especially if it is from 1st to 3rd.
|
|
|
12-27-2005, 08:18 PM
|
#12
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 224
|
Well, in 3rd person I would be the narrator and in 1st person it would be my main character, but I am like my main character. So I'm not sure if they would be that different.
Okay, thanks for the advice everyone.
|
|
|
12-28-2005, 06:50 AM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3
|
I know this might sound really stupid, but is it okay if most of your story takes place in first person, in which the main character tells the story and then at a different location with different characters the story takes place in third person? At the end of my story, both of the sets of characters meet and it is back in first person. The main character then gives their opinons and such about the happenings.
It might work, depending on how you do it. If you want to change from the first person narrative to the thirst person one, which is about what you at that time in the story don't know, you have to make the transition smoothly, as is, in my view, possible. You can, for instance, do it in this way:
Meanwhile, something happened [here goes perhaps the adverbial phrase denoting the place where it happened], which I knew [ or found out] only when [perhaps after everything was over].
Last edited by Klein : 12-28-2005 at 10:13 PM.
|
|
|
12-28-2005, 07:31 AM
|
#14
|
|
Writer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 38
|
If you're going to shift POV from a character-narrator (1st person limited) to a non-character-narrator (3rd person omniscient,) then --as others have stated-- be sure to mark the transition for the reader. Trading chapters (odd, 1st person, even 3rd person?) may be a solid structure that's less-likely to disorient readers once it's established.
I say go for it. I've seen it done-- both poorly and well-- and have no reason to believe that you wouldn't be able to make it work.
|
|
|
12-28-2005, 07:33 AM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
|
Basically, that is the ONLY way to do it, if the book is set up in different sections. As far as a different narrator, with first person, there is only one. With third, there can be multiples, as the perspective may change to different characters.
I like first person, it can be freeing but it's also a double edged sword, as you're restricted as far as getting inside the other character's heads. However, this can be done through the narrators perspective and through dialogue. I prefer third, because you can still have a 'main' narrator, albeit through a softer more distant voice, and you can shift to the other characters as your scenes/chapters change.
But I still think there needs to be a real good reason to be using both in one work, and this should be done only if you're a hundred percent sure it will benefit the story.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM. Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
|
|
Newsletter |
 |
|
Subscribe to Majestic the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
|
|
Link to Us:
|
|