Advertisers, Website promoters

If you only intend to advertise or promote a website, product, or opportunity to our members,
DO NOT REGISTER as a new member.

Click Here to obtain Admin permission to post your message as a guest promoter.

Promotions posted without Admin permission may be treated as spam.




Previously Banned members take note.
Click Here to apply for an Admin amnesty.

If you register another account, you breach the No Sock Puppets rule, which risks an instant permaban on discovery.



Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: "It's" or "its"

  1. #1
    Creative Area Specialist (Speculative Fiction) HarperCole's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,227

    "It's" or "its"

    This is probably the most common mistake I see in the work of new writers, so I'm making a thread here that I can quickly refer people to when the issue comes up.

    The usual mistake is to put a possessive apostrophe where it doesn't belong. Here's an example ...

    John's house had red tiles on it's roof. (Incorrect)

    John's house had red tiles on its roof. (Correct)

    I can see why writers make this mistake. After all, "John's" has a possessive apostrophe, so why not "it's" as well? However, personal pronouns don't follow the same rules as nouns.

    An easy way to remember this is to think of "its" as equivalent to "his" and "hers". None of these words take possessive apostrophes.

    The only time when "it's" is correct is when you're abbreviating "it is". For example ...

    "Well, its about time," said John. (Incorrect)

    "Well, it's about time," said John. (Correct)

    So, to summarise: use "its" when showing possession for something gender-neutral, and use "it's" when abbreviating "it is."

    I hope that this has been helpful. If you have any questions or have spotted any errors, please let me know below.

    HC
    Tackle the epic sestina in our March Purple Pip challenge!

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Sofiya, Bulgaria
    Posts
    591
    I mostly struggle with the apostrophe when someone possesses things and when to use it

  3. #3
    Creative Area Specialist (Speculative Fiction) HarperCole's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,227
    You should pretty much always put the possessive apostrophe in there if you're using a noun, for example ...


    • Nelson's ship
    • Obama's dream
    • The wind's fury
    • The Earth's gravity


    HC
    Tackle the epic sestina in our March Purple Pip challenge!

  4. #4
    The way I was taught to remember is "it's the exception" because it is.

  5. #5
    Regarding the possessive apostrophe:
    There are four and a half pages on forming possessives in the Chicago Manual of Style. There are exceptions to the rules below, but these are the general rules in that style guide, which is the most commonly used (aside from journalism and science writings). Note that the treatment of nouns ending in s may be different from what you are used to; Chicago now recommends an additional s to form possessives, which conflicts with some guides, e.g. Strunk & White's Elements of Style.

    For singular nouns, add apostrophe+s
    dog becomes dog's
    canvas becomes canvas's (words ending in s take a possessive s)
    Smith becomes Smith's
    Jones becomes Jones's (names ending in s take a possessive s)
    Jesus becomes Jesus's (ancient names still take a possessive s)
    Euripides becomes Euripides's (even if they end in eez sound)

    For plural nouns ending in s, add apostrophe only
    boys becomes boys'
    singers becomes singers'
    Joneses becomes Joneses'
    BUT children becomes children's

    If two people possess one thing, they get one apostrophe: Mom and Dad's driveway
    If two people possess two things, they get two apostrophes: Mom's and Dad's clothes

    Pronouns, in contrast, do not take an apostrophe in the possessive (hence the confusion with the possessive form its). So this balloon is hers, the building's paint is peeling from its walls, and the flowers are theirs, but his opinion remains unchanged.

    Remember also the converse: when a noun is not possessive, but only plural, it should not have an apostrophe. So several people named Mary are Marys, not Mary's.
    Last edited by per se; March 21st, 2017 at 03:56 PM.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by per se View Post
    For singular nouns, add apostrophe+s
    dog becomes dog's
    canvas becomes canvas's (words ending in s take a possessive s)
    Smith becomes Smith's
    Jones becomes Jones's (names ending in s take a possessive s)
    Jesus becomes Jesus's (ancient names still take a possessive s)
    Euripides becomes Euripides's (even if they end in eez sound)
    The Chicago Manual of Style is wrong.

    The singular of a noun does not require an apostrophe when it becomes plural.

    The dogs are barking; not the dog's are barking.

    The Joneses are a weird bunch; not the Jones's are a weird bunch.

    To write those any other way is demonstrably wrong.
    Site Rules and Regs

    My Website

    My blog

    My Novel

    "One morning I shot an elephant in my pyjamas. How he got into my pyjamas I'll never know." ~ Groucho Marx.

    "It is better to be feared than loved, if one cannot be both". ~ Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince.

    "A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer". ~ Bruce Lee.

    "In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's mind there are few". ~ Shunryu Suzuki.

    "Give a man a mask and he will show you his true face". ~ Oscar Wilde.

    "He who learns but does not think is lost; he who thinks but does not learn is in great danger". ~ Confucius.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam View Post
    The Chicago Manual of Style is wrong.

    The singular of a noun does not require an apostrophe when it becomes plural.

    The dogs are barking; not the dog's are barking.

    The Joneses are a weird bunch; not the Jones's are a weird bunch.

    To write those any other way is demonstrably wrong.
    Sam, I think you may have missed the context (from earlier in the thread) i.e. making singulars into possessives (rather than into plurals).


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •