Hey Jonesy,
Read the story twice.
I hope this is not too harsh, but you seem like someone that can take harsh.
You write with with very simple consice sentences. Mainly noun verb sentence structures. Those are usually the clearest senctences. Sentences are short. Not much comma use. You don't use many adverbs. Your dialogue uses little to no tags. This is just my obersvation of your writing style and is not mean to pass jugdment of whether it is good or bad. Just to make you aware of what you are doing.
The story seems really vague to me. There are parts where their could be stronger more specific word use and description. Mainly your adj use is kind of weak and leads to unnecessary telling
A few examples-
Quote:
|
Peter woke up to the same stench.
|
What stench? Of flowers? Of beer? etc
Quote:
|
He picked it up while an attractive blonde
|
attractive? Describe what she looks like, so the reader knows what kind of woman this man finds attractive. It gives insight to his character. Attractive is subjective. Does he like 400 pound hefers? Does he like the innocent librarian look?
Quote:
|
By the time Peter had parked in front of the sandwich shop fifteen minutes later, the obnoxious personality was telling about the possibility of degrees into the one ten to one fifteen range.
|
Obnoxious. Show us why the radio guy is obnoxious. How does his voice sound? What kind of stuff is he talking about? Is it stuff that peter hates/ doesn't agree with?
Quote:
|
The morning was dry and hot, the air was dusty and rusty.
|
Describe how the heat affects him instead of telling us.
Also the use of dusty and rusty at the same time is a bit awkward. Adv should usually be avoided.
---
The other thing I noticed is that he you make him do all these mundane things that have nothing to do with the story. He wakes up. He does push ups. He watches the news. He goes gets some food. It seems like you vaguely narrate every little thing he does and we don't really need any of that. It doesn't affect the plot or his character. None of the things he does tells us about his character.
The dialogue while it is easy to understand is also vague and mundane. Too ordainary, generic.
And then in the end you have him kill some jogger, who I think is Jenn, but am not sure. It could have been some ordainary jogger. Since you don't give a name. And also it can't be Jenn if she is working, plus it seemed like they just met at a bar, so how would he know that she jogged there.
Why did he choose today to kill her? It seems like he has been stalking her for a while. It wasn't like it took much planning.
The transistion from when he sees the jogger and then starts stabbing her is very awkward. First he is looking at the jogger, then suddenly he is in mid stab.
There wasn't much of a plot. He wakes up, talks to Jenn, eats, and kills some random woman. There's no real progression, none of the previous actions add up to why he kills this woman, unless she is Jenn, which is a bit better, but then we need motivation. There's no real conflict either.
--
I guess what you were trying to do was create a very mundana seemingly ordainary person, who seemed normal, but was really a killer.
---------
Quote:
|
I'm starting to doubt myself as a writer, because people generally don't like my stuff, but on the other hand, I don't like anybody else's. Anything I read I quickly lose interest in. It just doesn't seem very good to me. Even when tons of people think something is great, I don't see why it's so great. And when I write something I really like, people totally tear it apart. I just don't get it. Should I just forget about writing and focus on math, something I'm actually good at. Because it seems that writing just isn't for me.
|
I think everyone has doubts about themselves as writers, so it's kind of natural.
It's natural for you to like your stuff. There's a bias and ego involved. The hardest thing is to look at one's work in a nuetral way, so that you can see your own errors and mistakes.
It's not a problem that you don't like the work of others. Find authors that you actually like and read other people that write similarly. If you want to be a writer you should at least enjoy reading something, imo.
As for the work that is posted on here. For the most part we are all amatuers here, and most casual readers will probably not enjoy them very much. And that's okay. The big thing is for you to able to understand WHY you don't like them and also the stuff that you like about them. You learn a lot that way, but it takes time.
I hope I'm not totally discouraging you or anything. I hope you don't quit. You can defintely improve.