Guitar_chick133

I see it being used on here alot and I'm not to sure what that means. how do you know if you have one?

Wallmaker

Okay, so it's not a perfect term and it has some flex-room. I view high concept as an idea for a story that can be boiled down into one sentence or logline as it's called. And from this single sentence you should be able to glean most of the story.

Example:

Knocked-Up: A slacker average guy impregnates a successful and beautiful woman and must show he is capable of actively participating in a relationship to keep her.

Titanic: A high class woman falls in love with a low class man on a tragic sea voyage.

That being said... most stories have at least elements of high concept to them and you can in 1-2 sentences, summarize what the story, generally, is about. But high concept is usually associated with hollywood blockbuster films that are expected to have wide appeal with stars attatched and etc etc. They tend to deal with very broad themes that attract audiences (Titanic: Love conquers all), instead of more niche themes... A favorite movie of mine is Zach Braff's Garden State and it deals with one theme of a ambitionless generation of people. Now I relate becuase I have a connection to that theme, but it's a very cerebral theme. Does that make it a bad movie? Nope. It's just not high concept, or as universally appealing.

All in all "High Concept" is just a way to define your idea...not something you should worry about until after you write your idea. All it does is help you understand which sort of market your story fits in and present it as such.

__________________

Sam Winchester

Basically, "high-concept" means having a striking and easily communicable idea.

Sam.

__________________
To those who live by and never stray from the creedo of "show, don't tell," here's a thought - it's called storytelling not storyshowing.

lin

That's closer to it, Sam. It's often a twist, or a reversal of normality.

I'd called "Knocked Up" kind of medium-high concept, "Titanic" not at all.

Generally a high concept is an idea so unique that you can state it in a few words...and everybody will immediately see where the movie is going.

"A lawyer can't tell a lie." is a good example. "A man gets pregnant". "Arnie (or Rock or Vin or Seagall or somebody) takes care of little kids"
"A dog plays basketball"
"Mother and dauther's minds switch bodies" (or kid/adult, woman/man, human/animal, etc.

Sometimes the concept is just the vehicle for a well-written film that doesn' really depend on the gimmick for its impact. ("Twins"-- Devito and Arnie being twins is a high concept in itself) sometimes the film has nothing else going for it ("White Chicks" ).

It is true that a good high concept comedy, pulled off well, is one of your quickest tickets to getting something made. Cynically, you could search the permutations for body-swaps: Dog swaps with President, Baby with Elephant, Poledancer with Screenwriter (woops, forget that last one, nobody would beleive it)
Realistically, if you're lucky enough to come up with a good solid concept that nobody's done, you've got a leg up.
You could almost say these concepts come from a "what if?" premise. What if a kid outsmarted his kidnappers? What if the Pope was actually a woman? What if a mafia goon took a vow of nonviolence? What if you had a machine that could turn you into Keira Knightly? Or a jumpjet? Or one of Richard Gere's gerbils?

BIG problem with high concept................. once you tell somebody the idea, it's out of your control. Maybe somebody on this board doesn't have the juice to rip it off and write it (perhaps unconsciously) but how about some sleazy producer who can just call up some hack and tell them to slam out a quick script about two guys who have to get married to keep their jobs?

__________________

Vee

High Concept are two meaningless words. There will be plenty of people on this site that tell you this and that has been done. That your work is unoriginal because they've seen some movie, read some book or roleplayed in some game you have never heard of and just call it a rip off of that.

They'll call it a cliché.

There is nothing new under the sun.

High Concept is nothing but another way of saying cliché

__________________
Heart, Faith, Steel

Latest Work: Oz II, Oz

lin

That's absolutely wrong, Vee. Which I'm pointing out because somebody asked about in on this site and I don't want to confuse them.

This is a phrase HEAVILY used in the industry. It is NOT an equivalent for cliché and it has nothing to do with originality or "rip-off".

A high concept film can be trite ("White Chicks", "Guess Who?") or startlingly original ("The Mask") or just a good, solid film ("Twins", "Air Bud")

But it's confusing to blur over into terms that have nothing to do with it.

__________________

Vee

I sit corrected on 'High Concept'. I maintain there is no such thing as something 'original'.

__________________
Heart, Faith, Steel

Latest Work: Oz II, Oz

lin

You're wrong on that one, too. Not that it has anything to do with high concept. You run into that "nothing new is possible" crap on a lot of writing websites. It's pseudo-sophisticated nonsense by people trying to look cool and blase.

Obviously there is originality. Unfolding around us continuously.

__________________

lin

I come back to this one because that "nothing new is possible" stuff is SO prevalent on this type of site, and so confusing to new writers.

What I suggest is that people think about it. If there is nothing ever new, then there wouldn't be anything, right? Was the first novel a copy? Was the first story ever told a knockoff?

Well if, as is pretty patently obvious, it was once possible to have original thoughts and works...when did it become impossible to have them?

Or is it that there is a certain amount of original work possible, but it's all been used up?

Of COURSE there is original work done every day. Don't cripple yourself by pretending otherwise just becuase it sounds hip.

__________________

slayerofangels

I think the problem isn't really originality, but more a perception of it, if that makes any sense. Some people have an obsession with things being completely and utterly new and uninfluenced by what came before. Which is one definition. Since almost everything we do is coloured by our past experiences though, its a bit unlikely. Others try to go in new directions with ideas, which, done well, can be pretty good.

But to get thigns back on topic, Lin and Sam are pretty much spot on.

__________________

For Sale: One soul. Mint condition, never been used.

"In another life i'd be drenched in sweat with you but it's this life darlin', and in this life we make do." ~The Guillemots

Guitar_chick133

I think the " nothing is original" train of thought has what has been holding me back a little. I'll come up with an idea and think it's the greatest thing. then after that wears off I think to myself " Wait, Has this been done before?" the I get paranoid that I'm copying something I've never heard of. I've had some ideas that turned out to be just like other things. Like when I was 13 I had this great idea, but I found out later that it was the same premise of "Drop Dead Fred" and for years after if I heard of something similar I would make the mistake of watching it. I try not to now, if at all possible. I still wonder from time to time if what I come up with is truly original, but then I stifle the urge to find out because that also stifles my creative process.

Wallmaker

Well, that's sort of a double edge sword, isn't it? I mean, if you have an idea that turns out to be Drop Dead Fred... then it will never be made... because they already made Drop Dead Fred (your rendition probably will be waayy better than Drop Dead Fred becuase it was a terrible movie... but it has already been made and unless it's the Hulk, chances are, they aren't going to make it again). But if you watch Drop Dead Fred... then you can know how to change up your story to be something different. I had a friend in a very similar situation with... ironically enough, an imaginary friend premise well. He sat down, watched it... and was like.... oh, mine is different... it's really about X,Y, and Z it just also has an imaginary friend. He had one similar sequence as Drop Dead Fred and changed it so it would feel very different and much more personal to his story.

But if you never see what you're up against, you could be wasting your time. I'd hate to write a whole script only to find it's already been done. I understand feeling stressed and feeling stifled. But you know what GI JOE Says, Knowing is half the battle.

Go Joe!

__________________

lin

You didn't like Drop Dead Fred????? My GOD!! You must not have had or been an imaginary playmate.

Makes a LOT of sense. A lot of people's perception of creativity or originality is filtered through what they think is hip or cool or fashionable.

Shrek was a far better script than Pirates of the Caribbean, by the same writers. But few people cop to that because Shrek's for kids and Johnny Depp oozes hip.

The remake of "Breathless" KILLS the original for creativity, but try to get philm phreaks to buy into THAT one. Because Truffaut is so hip and verite and Fwansh and all that...and the remake is Richard Gere.

The recent Beowulf was some drop-dead genius writing in it. But few saw it. Too tripped out by the animation or whatever you'd call it.

Stardust is one of the best scripts I've ever seen--startling in it's original structure and premises--but few people can see it because of the style of the film.
On the other hand, they sing the praises of Pan's Labyrinth--a third rate script whose only really original moment is cinematic--because it's cool, and foreign and doesn't like fascists.

Juno is a drop-dead exercise in originality... or perhaps I should say "anti-cliche". But nobody sees it because it was written by a stripper and has kids talking cute trash.

So yeah, there's the real thing and there's perception. Which is pretty much Hollywood all over, no?

__________________

Wallmaker

Yeah...Shrek, Pirates, Stardust, Beowulf.

Funny you mention movies that have already be adapted from already successful material and formulas and praised them.

Juno and Pan's Labrinth... original material.

And you're right. I never was an imaginary friend.

__________________

lin

I don't think there was a book on Shrek, was there?

You never know...I read Forrest Gump before it was a movie and, believe it or not, Roger Rabbit.

Beowulf is the odd one. Take a ancient legend and whip it up into a multi-generational sex curse.

Screenplay co-written by Neil Gaiman, author of the book Stardust. He seems to be the guy to beat these days.

__________________