Removed
Removed
Last edited by Bloggsworth; 11-29-2011 at 11:10 PM.
Okay. I think you have an interesting idea here, but I must admit that your word-choice and images made the point of this poem very ambiguous, which is something that I normally love in poetry (as I tend to be very ambiguous myself). However, there are a few things that I find myself questioning for this piece. Examples:
"oblique in the evening sun" is really interesting here, but what that implies to me is that they're set off from the sun, therefore, shadowed, and therefore, it's a little redundant.I stumble
down shadowed sideswipes,
oblique in the evening sun.
Again, really interesting word-choice and vocabulary for this, but the image here is begging for something more concrete, and I think the way to fix that is to alter "puddled cobbes." I'm assuming you're talking about, like, cobblestone, since you're using cobble as a noun, but puddled literally puddles the image. Maybe another word. Is there an actual/metaphorical cobblestone road? Or just stones? It's unclear to me.Sintered light coalesces on
puddled cobbles,
The first half of this image is really interesting and something I can fully grasp, but I would completely cut "with each strike of copper on ancient render." The image is already saying that before you do.unclaimed
urchins play whoops-a-doodle,
tossing old pennies against
soft stuccoed walls, flaking
white with each strike of copper
on ancient render.
Who's crying? The "unclaimed urchins," I'm assuming, but it almost reads like the pennies. I'm not sure which you were intending. I was also a little bewildered by "split the close." I wasn't really sure what the close was, though the rest of the poem is really interesting. I also lost the "you" in this poem. It's at the beginning, then there's a series of interesting images, and then it's there again.Their shrill
cries split the close and fillet
my consciousness, re-layering
the half forgotten.
Basically, I'm a little stumped, I suppose. I'd like something more concrete here. However, I will say that the imagery here and the ideas are peculiar in the most wonderful way.
Last edited by Angel101; 10-29-2011 at 07:55 AM.
How NOT to receive criticism of your poetry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVQYtmO8tp8
^ Above video made by myself and my hilarious husband.
Follow me on Twitter
I refer you to "Don't Ask Me What I Mean" Edited by Clare Brown & Don Patterson...
Close: (Scot) the entry from the street to a tenement building or (English) commonly a narrow alley or passageway, not a main thoroughfare.
A man in possession of a wooden spoon must be in want of a pot to stir.
This is an intriguing little snapshot of a moment, or handful of moments, but I think it could be pared down a bit more to give it more impact.
First of all, Angel is right: you don't need the word "shadowed" at the beginning.
Second, "puddled cobbles" might be changed to "puddles in cobbles." I know that adds an extra syllable, but the image is much clearer.
Third, nix "copper on ancient render." I like the sound of it, but it draws attention away from "white with each strike," which is a really excellent internal slant rhyme. Plus you get some nice alliteration with "strike", "shrill" and "spitting."
Finally, I love the ending, but I'm not sure about "filleting my consciousness." I kind of want this to read "flaying my consciousness" instead, although that's not quite the same meaning.
Apologies in advance if this is unhelpful. I haven't done poetry crits for some time and I'm feeling really rusty.
Take a writer away from his typewriter and all you have left is the sickness which started him typing in the beginning. - Charles Bukowski
Get a dictionary and look up the word oblique if you can find any dictionary where it says that it means the same as shadow, I will send you sixpence
Puddled - Subject to puddling or form by puddling. A dip in the road may be subject to puddling, uneven cobbles may be subject to puddling, neither would be "puddles in...".
If there is no copper striking ancient render, what is causing the flaking?
Had I wished to flay (strip the skin off) my poetic conscience I would have said so, but not being a masochist, I chose to rearrange the layers of half-forgotten memory.
A man in possession of a wooden spoon must be in want of a pot to stir.
When I think of "oblique," I think of diverging or splitting off, and when you say "from the evening sun," it IMPLIES shadowed. That's what I was saying.
Oh, and "tossing pennies against soft stuccoed walls" would be doing the flaking in my head.
And frankly, your response to two decent reviews was ridiculous. If I wrote-off a review everytime someone didn't get something, I'd be writing-off every review. It's just rude. My time is limited, and I'm not wasting my time anymore.
How NOT to receive criticism of your poetry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVQYtmO8tp8
^ Above video made by myself and my hilarious husband.
Follow me on Twitter
Just thought I'd mention that my nits weren't the result of my not knowing what the words meant. I was thinking more in terms of sound, and of making the snapshot tighter. Angel made some good points, and I was trying to build on her review. You're free to disagree, but it won't kill you to be respectful about it.
Take a writer away from his typewriter and all you have left is the sickness which started him typing in the beginning. - Charles Bukowski
Bloggsworth, your first line, only two words, called out to my compassionate side “I stumble”. Who in this life cannot relate to this personal state of affair? It’s universal. You grabbed me from this beginning.
Brilliant use of Figure of Speech “Contrast“ The juxtaposition of opposites to create a striking effect. And that you did.“oblique in the evening sun”
Here we have vivid action. Drew me right in. I’m there with the urchins tossing old pennies, thinking of Dickens’s “Oliver Twist.” I’m introduced to England’s dear side, once again.urchins play whoops-a-doodle;
tossing old pennies against
soft stuccoed walls,
You have produced an elegantly wrought poem despite a deeply felt blealkness.
Last edited by SilverMoon; 10-30-2011 at 09:24 AM.
"Blessed are the cracked, for they shall let in the light" Groucho Marxhttp://www.punksoulpoet.com/2011/04/inspired-by-the-artist-andrea-wch/#top"Emalyne"
http://www.motleypress.artandsole.org.uk/Issue1opt.PDF
"No Forgiveness for the Chrysalis"
Angel, you kick off your critique by telling me I don't need to use a word which doesn't mean what you take it to mean, you later justify this by telling us that you take it to mean something different again - shadows are areas hidden from direct light; obliqueness references the characteristics of angles. I don't think it is rude to suggest that one checks the correct meaning of a word before one criticises its use.
A man in possession of a wooden spoon must be in want of a pot to stir.
My brain makes the connection to the shadow. Oblique also refers to "diverging from a given straight line or course," which is what I was trying to say. When you say "oblique in the evening sun" it was like you were saying that it was set off from the sun, and so I was like, "well, DUH!" What I was suggesting was maybe using a different word that doesn't have multiple meanings like that to show the angles you're trying to create with the shadow. But it's your work, so you have the right to do what you want with it. It was merely a suggestion. The way you dismissed it was rude. You could just say, "Thanks, but I disagree." And whatever. I disagree with reviews all the time. Nothing wrong with that.
How NOT to receive criticism of your poetry: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVQYtmO8tp8
^ Above video made by myself and my hilarious husband.
Follow me on Twitter
In that case, thanks, but I disagree with you unilaterally altering the meaning of a word in order to beat me over the head with it. You will no doubt have noticed that I have altered it, but differently...
A man in possession of a wooden spoon must be in want of a pot to stir.
Hmm... any particular reason for your choice of line breaks, dear friend?
Poets are always taking the weather so personally. They're always sticking their emotions in things that have no emotions.
Check out my new blog, complete with new poetry! - http://www.writingforums.com/blogs/squalid-glass/
Yes. With which particular one(s) do you have an issue? You're up early (or haven't got to bed yet!)
Last edited by Bloggsworth; 10-31-2011 at 11:37 AM.
A man in possession of a wooden spoon must be in want of a pot to stir.
Poets are always taking the weather so personally. They're always sticking their emotions in things that have no emotions.
Check out my new blog, complete with new poetry! - http://www.writingforums.com/blogs/squalid-glass/
I like the new edit, to me, perfect.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks