
Originally Posted by
Pete_C
This marches proudly on its boot soles in places, but in others it tiptoes around and at times it precariously totters towards the edge. It reads a bit like Patchen in places, and much as I like old Kenneth, I don't think it works for the mood you're trying to create. If this were mine, I'd also have serious debate with myself over the whole sole/soul thing. I think most people will be able to work out the duality, and for me (it might just be me), the use of soul was like underlining something I could already see! I found it mildly irritating.
( I very much get what you are saying here Pete. I too wondered if this piece might be a tad too "dumbed down". I decided to lean into " the direct approach " more so because of the subject matter than anything. Let's say it suits the "character" of the piece. You have my mind tinkering with different approaches now.)
Now, back to the actual content. I think at times there are elements that are redundant, and whilst you might have added them to complete some sort of format, for me they were unnecessary baggage that slowed the poem down. A great example is line 2 of stanza 1. For me, it was just a bit of puff that detracted from the image. Yes, we have boot soles, and yes, I know what a boot is. I don't need to be told that it's not a strappy arrangement. It's a bit like writing a poem about a dog, and saying "my big dog, neither cat nor badger is he...". For me, redundancy only works if it endorses something by adding a layer, and this doesn't. Oh, and I didn't like the Yes... at the beginning. For me, if this read: "A boot sole, to tame the stride of weather-worn grit. A thicker hide is set..." it has more power, more impact.
( Yeah... Definitely Drew mentioned the loss of impact due to structuring as well. A "trimming" would work here also, and I think that would actually lend itself well to the rural, grounded , mentality of this piece. Thank you )
Then it all goes a bit "beat" on us with "Sing the hymn... of boot soul." For me, this line and the others of its ilk are distractions. It's all a bit stylised and very Patchen (and I appreciate that you may also be trying to reflect some of the Whitman uplifting style, but I'm not sure it's needed when the other parts are so strong).
( Truth ? You have so busted me weakly attempting to rip off Whitman ! LOL I am happily taking my licks on that one ! )
With judicious use of red pen and with stout heart, you could extract from this a very telling and robust piece of work. At the moment I think it is a little confused, with some elaborations that don't add enough to justify their inclusion.
( Robust,,, exactly good word )
Bookmarks