Writers Forum - WritingForums.com Home Rules FAQ Members Groups Calendar Gallery Search
» Sign Up «

Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
  Search Forums
Lit.Org - Bootcamp for writers. Post your work and other writers review it, it's that easy.

Advanced Search



Go Back   Writers Forum - WritingForums.com > Creativity > Non-Fiction
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Non-Fiction Essays, Articles, Reviews etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2004, 05:08 PM   #1
Writer
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 37
hoolio
Editorial

We have to write an editorial for english class and I was wondering what you thought.

The Freedom of Choice

An HIV- positive couple is suing a fertility clinic for $90,000 because they refused to inseminate the woman. The couple had already paid $10,000 before the clinic said they wouldn’t inseminate her because there was a chance that the baby could have HIV and, if so, could sue the clinic.
This presents a catch 22 situation for the clinic: if they inseminate the woman and the baby is born HIV positive, it can sue the clinic, but when they refuse they get sued for not inseminating the woman. It is fair, of course, that the money that the couple had already paid should be refunded, but the fact that they are suing for the discrimination of being refused because they were HIV positive is, to put it bluntly, insane.
Fertility clinics should be free to refuse to artificially inseminate people because of things they think might affect them somehow, now or in the future, without the danger of being sued. This case is merely one of many in which the clinic has been held liable for refusing a client. A blind woman in Colorado is suing a clinic because they refused to inseminate her. They had observed her over several months and did not find her capable of mothering a child. She claimed she had help to care for the child when, in fact, she did not. You would think it would be their choice and their right to do so but, alas, no. The woman claims they refused her on basis of her disability, which is partly true. There was, however some research involved and they did not feel she was suitable to be a parent.
The main point in the matter is this: fertility clinics are doing people a favour, they don’t have to do it. It is not a right, it is a privilege and the fact that people are abusing that privilege is wrong. The clinics are trying to help them and the bottom line is, if they don’t want to treat someone, they shouldn’t have to.
__________________
I don't mind coming to work -- I just don't want to stay when I get there.
hoolio is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0


 
You are NOT Logged In.
User Name:

Password



Newsletter

Subscribe to Majestic
the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
Email:


Related Links

Link to Us:
Writing Forums - Discussions for Writers