Writers Forum - WritingForums.com Home Rules FAQ Members Groups Calendar Gallery Search
» Sign Up «

Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
  Search Forums
Lit.Org - Bootcamp for writers. Post your work and other writers review it, it's that easy.

Advanced Search



Go Back   Writers Forum - WritingForums.com > General > The Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Lounge Off-topic posts welcome here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-08-2007, 10:11 AM   #1
Prolific Writer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 213
WritingForum is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to WritingForum
The good/bad Paradox of Language

The good/bad Paradox of Language

Is the following true, and does it represent a problem to species that is quickly needing to recognize the importance of its home planet?


In the English language there seems to be a deficiency of words that one can used to describe things that are the opposite of good; things like what is currently going on with corporate America can be described as one of two things: things that denote religious ideas and things that denote a certain harmfulness (to the world). In the latter case, words like harmfulness, the words simply do not denote the breadth and length of the matter. These words, on the negative side of the spectrum, as right and wrong are concerned, are many, but very few--if any--will actually move an audience in the way that the other side of the spectrum will (the other side of the spectrum in this case being words like evil, denoting religion in some fashion). So, for instance, if I were to say: "corporate America is the most evil thing imaginable," it would surely get an overwhelming feeling on the part of listener. If I were to, however, try to say the same thing without religious connotations, as in "corporate America is the most bad thing imaginable," the reaction wouldn't carry the same force to it as the former. In English, when dealing with words like these, the speaker is forced to either use words that do not inspire the listener to action or use words with religious connotations. Thus, if a speaker wants to move the listener he must appeal to a higher power, god, and this simple intrinsic fact is why we never get away from religious notions of good and bad and why we never can move a listener, in clear succinct terms, to action without using or calling to religion.
__________________
Now reading:
  • Douglas Adams - Mostly Harmless
[formerly jp]
Private Joke

O I loath the symbolism of the Corvette quarter;
It says, look how in bed we are with corporate!

_____________________
________________________________________________________ ________
WritingForum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0


 
You are NOT Logged In.
User Name:

Password



Newsletter

Subscribe to Majestic
the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
Email:


Related Links

Link to Us:
Writing Forums - Discussions for Writers