Writers Forum - WritingForums.com Home Rules FAQ Members Groups Calendar Gallery Search
» Sign Up «

Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
  Search Forums
Lit.Org - Bootcamp for writers. Post your work and other writers review it, it's that easy.

Advanced Search



Go Back   Writers Forum - WritingForums.com > General > The Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Lounge Off-topic posts welcome here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2005, 06:12 PM   #1
Ink Slinger
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: sort of upstate NY
Posts: 2,834
daniela is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to daniela
"Microsoft Word Grammar Checker Are No Good..."

I was reading Making Light today and I ran across an interesting link. There have been many discussions on WF about the near uselessness of MS Word's grammar checker (which isn't necessarily a bad thing because it gives copy editors something to do and teaches writers to get off their butts and study grammar). Now an associate professor at the University of Washington has come to the same conclusion and offers up some amusing examples on his website (well, it's funny if you know basic grammar).

Enjoy!

Microsoft Word Grammar Checker Are No Good, Scholar Conclude

--DM--
__________________
"When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them—then the rest will be valuable." - Mark Twain
daniela is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 06:17 PM   #2
Best Seller
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: a house on the moon
Gender: Female
Posts: 517
Gauda
I honestly can say I do agree. In fact, they're worse than no good...they're crap. It's so annoying right-clicking and having to press "ignore" countless times. Some of their synonoms suck too...in fact, most of them do. I know that I can no longer depend on Microsoft word for my grammer problems.
__________________
We live; we love; we learn; we soak it in; we spit it out; we run in circles and then sleep face down, with our heads buried in our pillows, trying to shut it out.

http://farfromnirvana.blogspot.com
Gauda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 06:26 PM   #3
Ink Slinger
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: sort of upstate NY
Posts: 2,834
daniela is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to daniela
You can change the settings so it won't flag everything. For example, I like to use sentence fragments sometimes so I went to Tools-Options-Settings and unchecked the appropriate boxes ("Fragments and Run-ons" and “Fragment - stylistic suggestions").

--DM--

Edit: I forgot a step. It goes Tools-Options-Spelling & Grammar-Settings.
__________________
"When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them—then the rest will be valuable." - Mark Twain
daniela is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 06:53 PM   #4
Wordsmith
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 5,240
Ilan Bouchard is an unknown quantity at this point
Luckily, Microsoft Word doesn't have a grammar check on my mac. Or maybe it's a feature I turned off. Either way, I haven't seen the green line in a while, for better, not worse.
__________________
Ruthless comments encouraged!
Ilan Bouchard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 08:27 PM   #5
Scribe
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: England
Posts: 70
MetalDog
I don't have a problem with it. It has its limitations, but as long as you're aware of them it can be a useful second set of eyes.

Unflagging the gender specific and business oriented aspects of it, I let it catch fragments, passive voice and run on sentences in particular. I feel free to ignore the wavy green line, but sometimes I love fragments /too/ much and seeing the hoards all underlined encourages me to explore other ways of saying the same thing. I've often ended up with a much tighter piece after a rethink.

If you relied on it to know all your grammar for you, you'd be screwed. As long as you know its limitations, it's not too dreadful a thing to have lurking in the background as a reminder not to get sloppy.
__________________
~MetalDog
"So, I figured that if I was going to react, I may as well overreact..."
Alan Moore
MetalDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2005, 02:39 PM   #6
Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Portimão, Portugal
Posts: 107
Luis Santos
Send a message via MSN to Luis Santos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gauda
I honestly can say I do agree. In fact, they're worse than no good...they're crap. It's so annoying right-clicking and having to press "ignore" countless times. Some of their synonoms suck too...in fact, most of them do. I know that I can no longer depend on Microsoft word for my grammer problems.

nothing like good old book, on shelf
Luis Santos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 AM.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0


 
You are NOT Logged In.
User Name:

Password



Newsletter

Subscribe to Majestic
the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
Email:


Related Links

Link to Us:
Writing Forums - Discussions for Writers