Writers Forum - WritingForums.com Home Rules FAQ Members Groups Calendar Gallery Search
» Sign Up «

Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
  Search Forums
Lit.Org - Bootcamp for writers. Post your work and other writers review it, it's that easy.

Advanced Search



Go Back   Writers Forum - WritingForums.com > General > The Lounge
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Lounge Off-topic posts welcome here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-21-2008, 08:09 AM   #1
Writing Machine
 
JoannaMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,660
JoannaMac is on a distinguished road
War in Iraq and Global Warming

I found this today on a website called PowerSwitch - Peak Oil news, Peak Oil forum, Peak Oil DVDs for the UK and thought it worth posting here. The mind boggles..........

  • Projected total US spending on the Iraq war could cover all of the global investments in renewable power generation that are needed between now and 2030 in order to halt current warming trends.

    2. The war is responsible for at least 141 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) since March 2003. To put this in perspective, CO2 released by the war to date equals the emissions from putting 25 million more cars on the road in the US this year.

    3. Emissions from the Iraq War to date are nearly two and a half times greater than what would be avoided between 2009 and 2016 were California to implement the auto emission regulations it has proposed, but that the Bush Administration has struck down. Finally, if the war was ranked as a country in terms of annual emissions, it would emit more CO2 each year than 139 of the world's nations do. Falling between New Zealand and Cuba, the war each year emits more than 60% of all countries on the planet.

    4. Just the $600 billion that Congress has allocated for military operations in Iraq to date could have built over 9000 wind farms (at 50 MW capacity each), with the overall capacity to meet a quarter of the country's current electricity demand. If 25% of our power came from wind, rather than coal, it would reduce US GHG emissions by over 1 billion metric tons of CO2 per year -- equivalent to approximately 1/6 of the country's total CO2 emissions in 2006.

    5. In 2006, the US spent more on the war in Iraq than the whole world spent on investment in renewable energy.

    6. US presidential candidate Barack Obama has committed to spending "$150 billion over 10 years to advance the next generation of green energy technology and infrastructure." The US spends nearly that much on the war in Iraq in just 10 months.
__________________
If you aint got nuffink, you can't lose it!


JoannaMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 10:05 AM   #2
A-L
Profound Writer
 
A-L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,236
A-L is on a distinguished road
Hmm...I'm not sure what to say about this, except that it's kind of sad. Actually it's very sad. But then again, the goverment views the war in Iraq as an immediate necessity. Whereas renewable fuel is somewhat not so important...
A-L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 10:17 AM   #3
Writing Machine
 
JoannaMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,660
JoannaMac is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-L View Post
Hmm...I'm not sure what to say about this, except that it's kind of sad. Actually it's very sad.
Exactly what I felt. Just sad and a bit defeated because of the enormity of these stats.
__________________
If you aint got nuffink, you can't lose it!


JoannaMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2008, 12:00 PM   #4
lin
Wordsmith
 
lin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On islands
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,988
lin is on a distinguished road
The irony is that the war is costing more money than the social spending that Republicans criticize in Democrats.

The biggest disaster in American history and nobody is even running against it.
__________________
lin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2008, 08:11 AM   #5
Writing Machine
 
JoannaMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,660
JoannaMac is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lin View Post
The irony is that the war is costing more money than the social spending that Republicans criticize in Democrats.
Yeah, I get sick of Republicans banging on about the underserving poor when they have no problem spending triple the amount of government funding on welfare for the rich

Quote:
The biggest disaster in American history and nobody is even running against it.
What do you mean by this lin?
__________________
If you aint got nuffink, you can't lose it!


JoannaMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0


 
You are NOT Logged In.
User Name:

Password



Newsletter

Subscribe to Majestic
the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
Email:


Related Links

Link to Us:
Writing Forums - Discussions for Writers