Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will
be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
| The Lounge Off-topic posts welcome here. |
08-18-2008, 12:05 PM
|
#1
|
|
Wordsmith
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On islands
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,988
|
Scientists know everything
Quote:
|
A commonplace of cosmologists who argue the anthropic principle is the assumption that if any or a few of the constants of nature took on an even slightly different value, life could not have evolved — perhaps even stars and galaxies would not form. Science News reports on a new calculation showing that, to the contrary, star formation could happen in up to one-quarter of universes with different values of three important constants. "In fact, all universes can support the existence of stars, provided that the definition of star is interpreted broadly," said the researcher, Fred Adams.
|
My favorite example of scientific pronouncements not always being based on anything actually logical, or even sensical has always been Carl Sagan's lame calculation of the percentage of other planets in the universe that had civilizations like ours. (Made at a time no other star had been observed to have planets)
But this is breath-takingly wider in scope. This guy has information on the probability of OTHER UNIVERSES.
|
|
|
08-18-2008, 12:25 PM
|
#2
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Location, Location
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,610
|
Eh, those scientists are well behind. Priests have been telling us about those for millenia.
If scientists were less dumb, they'd have the evangelism rackets going too. "Send me $100 so I can prove which of your uncles was a chimp!"
|
|
|
08-19-2008, 06:37 PM
|
#3
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,226
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lin
This guy has information on the probability of OTHER UNIVERSES.
|
He's describing other universes in the hypothetical sense and the probability of the formation of stars based on different constant values (there's a couple dozen of them) that form the basis of modern physics.
__________________
The most frightening part of leaving a parent's home, to me, is not knowing where one's own home is.
|
|
|
08-19-2008, 06:47 PM
|
#4
|
|
Addict
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 169
|
Breaking news: lin doesn't comprehend science or how it works, naively equates it with faith.
More ignorance to follow.
|
|
|
08-19-2008, 07:11 PM
|
#5
|
|
Writing Machine
Join Date: Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,661
|
Erm.... I'd have say... FAITH, as in GOD, is bullshit. To repeat lin: Dorkhorse.
But this is not the thread for this.
I love you, lin. You're such a dick. *sits back to watch the newfound rivalry commence*
|
|
|
08-19-2008, 07:14 PM
|
#6
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: May 2008
Location: in a red volvo
Gender: Male
Posts: 485
|
....Go easy on him.
__________________

|
|
|
08-19-2008, 07:37 PM
|
#7
|
|
Mentor
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,487
|
He's presenting his idea. "The assumption" is right in the quote.
Dawkins has a great story about one of his professors having spent fifteen years devising and arguing for a theory, then a guest lecturer in his class completely proving him wrong. The prof walked up to the guest lecturer and shook his hand, thanking him for showing him the truth.
That's my idea of science.
__________________
There Is A Policeman Inside All Our Heads: He Must Be Destroyed
|
|
|
08-19-2008, 07:55 PM
|
#8
|
|
Addict
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 169
|
The irony is that science's greatest strength is the fact that it's open to revision when new evidence is discovered.
A lot of people don't understand that, and see it as a weak point: hey, science doesn't know everything, and keeps changing it's mind! That's not a flaw, because science is not a belief system.
Conjecture isn't "faith" when it's based on observable evidence. That's where fundies like lin go wrong, because they simply assume science is another competing faith.
It's not faith when it's based on objectivity and is able to be revised. This snippet discusses reasonable assumptions based on extrapolation of known data: that's where the "logic" part comes in. The conclusion follows from the premises.
|
|
|
08-19-2008, 08:56 PM
|
#9
|
|
Adept Writer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 752
|
DarkHorse, who are you debating?
__________________
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice."
Thomas Paine
|
|
|
08-19-2008, 09:04 PM
|
#10
|
|
Addict
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 169
|
I'm not debating anyone. I was just expanding on Malone's point.
I can't comment on the topic without it being a debate?
|
|
|
08-19-2008, 09:05 PM
|
#11
|
|
Mentor
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,487
|
I appreciated what you had to say.
__________________
There Is A Policeman Inside All Our Heads: He Must Be Destroyed
|
|
|
08-19-2008, 11:58 PM
|
#12
|
|
Adept Writer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 752
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkHorse220
I'm not debating anyone. I was just expanding on Malone's point.
I can't comment on the topic without it being a debate?
|
Apparently not! You're debating Lin, or trying [so quit lying].
...But science is (largely) a belief system. Certainly no one observed the "Big Kaboom," but there are many believers.
__________________
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice."
Thomas Paine
|
|
|
08-20-2008, 12:02 AM
|
#13
|
|
Profound Writer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: America.
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,055
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood
.
...But science is (largely) a belief system. Certainly no one observed the "Big Kaboom," but there are many believers.
|
...
Seriously?
|
|
|
08-20-2008, 12:07 AM
|
#14
|
|
Mentor
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,487
|
Quote:
|
Certainly no one observed the "Big Kaboom," but there are many believers.
|
You're right, we can only witness up to 1/10000000 of a second before it happened.
__________________
There Is A Policeman Inside All Our Heads: He Must Be Destroyed
|
|
|
08-20-2008, 12:19 AM
|
#15
|
|
Wordsmith
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On islands
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,988
|
Quote:
|
Eh, those scientists are well behind. Priests have been telling us about those for millenia
|
.
Jesus. Comment on science. SECOND POST for some reason takes off on priests and religions, as though that was at issue.
Weird. I guess if you're god-bashing you don't have to think. I give up. This thing went to full stupid even before dorkhorse stuck his nose/ass into it.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 AM. Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
|
|
Newsletter |
 |
|
Subscribe to Majestic the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
|
|
Link to Us:
|
|