display your banner here

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Important Changes to Literary Manuevers

  1. #1
    Prolific Writer
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    488

    Important Changes to Literary Manuevers

    Quick Summary of Changes to Literary Manuevers

    -Instead of using Mentors/Mod exculsively as judges, Literary Manuevers is now open for everyone to judge.

    -For directions on how to judge the entries click here: LM Adjudication

    -Scores will be sent to me through PM.

    -Judging will last one week, to give judges time.


    Current List of Judges for LM #7
    -sliverwriter
    -aprilrain
    -Chris Miller
    -FollowingShadow
    Last edited by gohn67; 03-12-2006 at 09:59 AM.

  2. #2
    silverwriter
    Guest
    pssssssssst. that link doesn't work.

  3. #3
    Prolific Writer
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    488
    thanks SW, fixed it now.

  4. #4
    silverwriter
    Guest
    mkay.

    so, it's still out of 20? i thought you said something about it being out of ten...

    ??

    *easily confused*

  5. #5
    Prolific Writer
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    488
    lol, to avoid confusion I decided to make it out of 20 again, but I guess that created more confusion. I still need to work out the scoring system for it to be out of ten and I have to alter the guidelines, but at the moment I just want to see how LM6 plays out.

  6. #6
    silverwriter
    Guest
    hehehe. kudos for the effort. i'm glad you took up the cause. thanks for clarifying for me.

  7. #7
    Profound Writer Pawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    1,432
    Blog Entries
    5
    To throw an oar in, I'll say only that scoring out of ten runs the risk of half the entries getting seven and the other half eight. Though more effort, I picked twenty in an attempt to leave room for accuracy and differentiation. Of course, if you can find a way of making it work well out of ten, for example making the difference in each measurement not absolutely equal (4-5<6-7), I will but congratulate you.
    C.A.

  8. #8
    Adept Writer
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    962
    When was changing it to ten suggested/implemented? I thought the scoring was doing well, for the most part.
    Ruthless comments encouraged!

  9. #9
    Prolific Writer
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    488
    I'm problem not going to change it, still haven't gotten it to work out, keep running into the problems that Pawn mentioned.

  10. #10
    Scrivener
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by gohn67
    I'm problem not going to change it, still haven't gotten it to work out, keep running into the problems that Pawn mentioned.
    Tsk tsk.

    And to stay on topic, a wise & clichéd quote would be in place: "Don't fix what isn't broken."

  11. #11
    Scrivener Londongrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tiny village in Dorset, UK
    Posts
    125
    Any changes to keep the LM moving are welcome, they are pleasure to read as well as take part in.
    You are only as dull as the light in the room you occupy, everything else is just hearsay - Me, about five minutes ago.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •