display your banner here

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Rules of Writing, Part Two

  1. #1
    Ink Slinger The Backward OX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Up Sh*t Creek without a paddle, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    4,711

    Wink Rules of Writing, Part Two

    So, I’ve been playing with the following passage as part of my WIP. There’re two versions. The first one is all past tense and the second one messes with the tenses. Amongst other things, one sentence in the second version contains both future and past tense.

    Is there any rule that says the first version is the only way to go, or are both equally okay?

    (To put you in the picture, the guy is looking for a specific hard-copy file)

    For close to thirty minutes Morgan rummaged through boxes. Occasionally an item caught his attention and he paused to read it. Then he realised he’d diverted himself from his purpose and after shuffling the papers back into place, returned the box to the stack with a self-deprecating shake of his head.

    For close to thirty minutes Morgan rummaged through boxes. Occasionally an item would catch his attention and he’d pause to read it. Then he’d realise he’d diverted himself from his purpose and after shuffling the papers back into place, would return the box to the stack with a self-deprecating shake of his head.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Ink Slinger The Backward OX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Up Sh*t Creek without a paddle, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    4,711
    Did I just do that?

  3. #3
    Supervisor
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bandit Country
    Posts
    3,881
    Of course they're both equally okay. One is in the pluperfect, and the other is in the past tense. Generally speaking, you need pluperfect if you're writing a scene in your story that took place previous to where your current story takes place. A flashback, if you will.
    Site Rules and Regs

    My Website

    My blog

    My Novel

    "To sin by silence, when we should protest, makes cowards out of men".


  4. #4
    Trying to Bee good terrib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Back in hell...better known as Texas
    Posts
    1,013
    Exactly...go with the first one, Ox...
    至 高 神 的 孩 子
    Yī zhìgāo shén de háizi


    Nails did not keep our Savior on the cross, love did.
    Can I get an amen...

  5. #5
    WF Veteran Foxee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    In a hammock strung from two stars.
    Posts
    6,358
    Blog Entries
    3
    As previously said, they're both correct. The first one reads a lot better.

    Reading maketh a full man, conference a ready man, and writing an exact man. -Sir Francis Bacon

    ArdusOriginal Fantasy RPG


  6. #6
    Adept Writer spider8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Surrey/london
    Posts
    967
    I prefer the first though they both read okay. I find the '...he'd...' used so closley together in the second a bit clumsy. I'd prefer '...he had...' using apostraphes like this is fine in dialogue but I want authority in prose. I don't want the author to be my pal, rather my authoritative guide, if you know what I mean. When I write a first draft I'll do this myself for speed, but when I edit I get rid of them, even if I have to restructure sentences and paras.

    btw, I'd also prefer 'For nearly thirty minutes...' but maybe that's just my taste.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •