Well, that was very thorough. Thanks a lot for the detailed criticisms. I'll try to address the points that I thought I had covered.
- I can see all of the cliches, grammar mistakes, wording errors, etc. in the piece so I won't focus on those.
- The man asking about the capital. This is supposed to be normal dialogue between two people; naturally, most people would say "it" as referring to the capital instead of saying "the capital" again. Most people wouldn't constantly worry about correct grammar in normal conversation, especially when confronted by the elements.
- Nice point about the bacterium. I actually created a fictional disease, but a severe strain of one already existing could add a bit of reality to it, which is always nice.
- Protagonist's character. The doctor's character is gradually revealed through flashbacks in the story. His personality is also shown through his future actions and by how he acts around people. Though, perhaps I should make it a bit more clear.
- The people not dying by lack of prosthetics. I don't know that much about medical issues; I'm only in high school. Then again, that's what Wikipedia is for. I'll try to be more accurate.
- Asterisks signify either a time break or a change in situation, like a flashback.
Overall, thanks a ton for the great criticisms. Glad you enjoy it so far!



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


