
Originally Posted by
alanmt
Well you are a lucky man, I am/was LDS, and I had to start all over again after I came out, and divorced my wife. (she forgives me) I lost my Job with the company I was working for, because the owner was comrades with my bishop.
Question No. 2: I can only speak for myself, and the answer is no. There are a lot more straight people than gay or bi people, and that is cool with me; to my mind a person's sexuality is only relevant if I want to date them or introduce them to someone else who may be romantically interested in them, although I make a greater effort to include gay people in my social circle, because living in Montana is more difficult and isolating for some gay people than for me.
Again you are a lucky man, I am glad that you have not went through what others have. Montana is a lot like Utah in that respect.
I will say that Kane has been very respectful in his posts, while firmly stating his opinion, and I appreciate the courtesies. However, I am also a Christian and I disagree with his position 100%. My theological answer to people like him is that I am no less a Christian than he is; rather I am a better one, for I have a better understanding of the true meaning of the bible and the message of Jesus, and I love him, although I regret his misguided misinterpretation of scripture. Uncomfortable as it may be to say it, if we were debating 50 years ago, people like Kane would be strenuously arguing against interracial marriage; 100 years ago, against women's suffrage, and 150 years ago, in favor of slavery, in all cases relying on biblical text. Because People like Kane were making those arguments. Not isolated individuals, but large groups of ordinary people with firm religious convictions.
Yes I respect Kanes convictions, does not mean I agree, I have some family members that have the same ones, I still welcome the ones that still have me in their circle with open arms, and I leave those alone that want nothing more to do with me. It is there loss not mine!
I am firmly and sincerely convinced I understand the message of the Bible better than people like Kane do. While Kane may believe this is disrespectful to his beliefs, it is not, it is a mirror image of his own faith. It is certainly not disrespectful of religion; it is a religious understanding.
The way I see it Christs message was about love, I also am a believer in God. As I have stated religion is another issue!
I love God, Kane, and I love you. But you are wrong. Pax Vobiscum.