Did you even read my last post beyond the first sentence? "I don't deny any individual's experience with what appears to be supernatural. I've had my own experience with an event which confounds my ability to explain it, and I know of others who have also." How does that constitute an attack of any sort?
As I said above, but will repeat again, my problem is with those who profiteer from the beliefs of others. The entire history of 'psychical research' is filled with shams and charlatans. That's why Harry Houdini got into the business of debunking the fakes, as it seems Carrington did also.



7Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote
