LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksOriginally Posted by Terry D
Good enough quote from another thread to appropriate for the purpose of this subject. Taking some liberties with Terry's words of course.
Are militia companies a good enough thing for strategic, national interests, and a favorable addition to national GDP's with little negative extranalities? Or do militia companies lack sufficient justification in national interests and national GDP's?
1. DynCorp - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
DynCorp International[2] is a United States-based private military company (PMC) and aircraft maintenance company. DynCorp receives more than 96% of its $2 billion in annual revenues from the US federal government.[3]2. DynCorp - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe company has provided services for the U.S. military in several theaters, including Bolivia, Bosnia, Somalia, Angola, Haiti, Colombia, Kosovo and Kuwait.[4] DynCorp International also provided much of the security for Afghan interim president Hamid Karzai's presidential guard and trains much of Afghanistan's and Iraq's fledgling police force.[5]
3. Employee involvement in child sex slave trafficPrivate drug enforcement and military interdiction in Latin America
4. DynCorp - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaAccording to whistleblower Ben Johnston, a former aircraft mechanic who worked for the company in Bosnia, DynCorp employees and supervisors engaged in sex with 12 to 15 year old children, and sold them to each other as slaves.[18] Ben Johnston ended up fired, forcing him into protective custody. According to Johnston, none of the girls were from Bosnia itself, but were kidnapped by DynCorp employees from Russia, Romania and other places.
Dancing boy incident
DynCorp workers who were employed to train Afghan policemen took drugs and paid for young "dancing boys" (child prostitutes) to entertain them in Kunduz, according to one of the US embassy cables released by WikiLeaks.[23][24][25]
Reply With Quote