I have a theory that a writer’s fundamental nature determines the voice he/she displays in their fiction writing; that if they are taciturn and reserved by nature, their writing will reflect this, if they are exuberant and boisterous by nature, their writing will reflect this, if they are sensuous and erotic by nature, their writing will reflect this, and so on.
Put another way, a person who takes life seriously could not successfully write about a character acting the fool, a person who habitually acts the fool could not successfully write about a serious character, a person who is highly-opinionated could not successfully write about a character of wishy-washy nature, and a wishy-washy person could not successfully write about an opinionated character.
And to wrap it all up, male writers cannot successfully portray female characters, nor female writers male characters.
What do you think?




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote




