Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will
be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
| Classic Literature Discuss the classics like Poe, H.G. Wells, Mark Twain, Oscar Wilde, Emily Dickinson etc. Read them at Literature Vault. |
07-29-2007, 01:11 PM
|
#1
|
|
Best Seller
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 503
|
A Clockwork Orange
I am routinely criticized for my list of favorite books. I'm told that it looks like I just took a literature class reading list and reproduced it as my favorites. Well, there is a reason you read those books in a literature class - they are great books.
One I have not seen on this board yet (but I am new) is Anthony Burgess' A Clockwork Orange. When I go on vacations, I usually pack this book, as well as The Great Gatsby. They are both so well written, IMO and are short, easy reads. I could read both books 100 times, and have already read them four times each.
I often hear people discussing the Stanley Kubrick movie, A Clockwork Orange. I didn't necessarily dislike the movie, but it just does not do justice to the masterpiece that is Burgess' book.
This book was written a mere 40 years ago - does it qualify as a "Classic" yet?
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 07:51 PM
|
#2
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Gender: Private
Posts: 205
|
Sure it's a classic. A stunning book which I've read a couple of times myself - first to simply enjoy / second to increase my then beginner Russian.
Interesting though - I couldn't read any book 100 times when there are so many others out there waiting for me to open them!
__________________
RuKsaK
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 10:23 PM
|
#3
|
|
Profound Writer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,397
|
I thought the movie was as close to reproducing the book accurately as any other book-movie rendition I have ever seen. The only things Kubrick really didn't include were the prison cell scenes, and Burgess' intended ending, which I never particularly liked anyways.
Great book. Should be required reading in all high school classes. Yes, it's a classic.
__________________
What would your good be doing if there were no evil, and what would the earth look like if shadows disappeared from it?
- Woland (Satan) in Bulgakov's "Master and Margarita"
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 11:03 PM
|
#4
|
|
Mentor
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,256
|
You didn't like the ending? How come?
It's pretty important in terms of structure and everything. Mind you, though, I've been studying it for English, so I've been picking up on things I normally wouldn't have. I still think I'd have liked the ending, anyway. Loved the book, but I think it's kind of sad that Burgess didn't really like the book himself, and felt that his other novels were far better.
|
|
|
07-31-2007, 11:52 PM
|
#5
|
|
Profound Writer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,397
|
I didn't like the ending because the whole book was hinged on the idea of choice, and to have an unhappy ending, I felt, would have hammered home the idea of free will, however misguided we percieve an individual. Free will, according to many accounts, is about the choice between good or evil.
(I am trying to justify my viewpoint without examples drawn directly from the book, in the hopes that I don't ruin it for anyone)
__________________
What would your good be doing if there were no evil, and what would the earth look like if shadows disappeared from it?
- Woland (Satan) in Bulgakov's "Master and Margarita"
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 12:02 AM
|
#6
|
|
Wordsmith
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On islands
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,706
|
The entire point of Clockwork Orange is a brilliant endrun AROUND good and evil.
If you are a clockwork orange, it is saying...a living thing, but with mechanistic programming inside...then are your a choosing entity?
The good comes with the evil, you notice. Suppressing the violence also suprresses the music. Curing the repression of violence, with Alex (the conqueror) brilliant use of it to attain a state sinecure, ends up delivering him into the hands of the society he had escaped through his criminal career.
The film's ending is very good... a thorny moral knot. But the "aftermath" depicted in the book is wickeder yet... and points up the signature conflict of the book even more. It's hilarious that Georgie returns in this role, just as he and Dim popped again as policemen--agents of the repressive state itself.
It's one damn deep book and it's amazing that it was made into such a sensational movie without losing the philosophical import. I personally consider it the greatest picture ever made.
Another really insidious thing about the book: by the time you're through reading it, you know nadsat. You bought in to that extent just READING about it.
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 06:32 AM
|
#7
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South-east UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,697
|
Lin said it all. Damn, another missed opportuity to look clever...
I don't think Burgess disliked the book, just the way it was sensationalised at the expense of his other work. Much the same as Kubrick's reasons for withdrawing the movie.
It's a modern classic, without question. Superbly crafted, and - unusually - without any moral bias. Most authors would have tried to steer the reader one way or another, whereas Kubrick maintains an amoral neutrality.
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 07:44 AM
|
#8
|
|
Best Seller
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 503
|
I'm glad to see others on the board enjoyed the book as much as I did. Like I said, I didn't dislike the movie, it just didn't compare to the book for me. The thing that always bothered me was the age of Malcolm McDowell in the movie. I know that it would be difficult to find a well crafted actor who is really 15 years old, as Alex is in the book. But if I'm not mistaken, McDowell was nearly 30 when that movie came out. I just have trouble getting past that, plus the fact that the last chapter was omitted (as it was from the originally published US version of the book).
But it was a good movie, just the same. In sharp contrast to the lame attempt at adapting a portion of John Irving's A Prayer for Owen Meany into a movie (Simon Birch). To me, that was the worst butcher job of a great book that has ever graced the silver screen. I have heard that Irving fought to get the characters' names changed and disassociated himself with the film project all together - wise move.
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 08:47 AM
|
#9
|
|
Best Seller
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Deep Depths of Hell
Gender: Male
Posts: 655
|
Was the movie just made to horrify people?? It seems "thee" reason for making it as there doesn't seem to be an interesting story behind it.
__________________
I don't need to convince you to become an atheist, because you already believe in Nothing, you only have to convince yourself
Check out my blog:
http://quantumbomber.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 10:11 AM
|
#10
|
|
Wordsmith
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On islands
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,706
|
I am praying that was a tongue in cheek remark.
Hack, are you aware that A Wanting Seed is set in the same milieu as Orange? Not as gripping, but interesting. A future in which overpopulation is being combatted by officially promoting homosexuality.
One thing I always notice about the film is that is seems so much longer than other films. That's not a bad thing. It just packs so much into each scene and keeps shifting into different worlds with different emotional strata.
After the wild ride leading to Alex' arrest, you almost wait to see the credits. But no, suddenly we're in a prison and a whole new parameter starts opening up. Then he's released and there's a whole nother story. It just keeps unfolding.
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 10:19 AM
|
#11
|
|
Best Seller
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 503
|
Lin, I do not know anything about A Wanting Seed, but if draws any comparisons to A Clockwork, I will make a point of reading it.
I also like how the book (and, as you point out, the movie) is structured into three distinct sections - mischeif, reform and consequences (my words for the sections, not Burgess'). My copy of the book is a more recent edition with the previously missing Chapter 21 in place. It has an introduction by Burgess, who discusses the structure of the book. The introduction heightens my respect for Burgess as a writer, which is difficult to do, as there is not much room to heighten after reading the book itself.
|
|
|
08-01-2007, 07:27 PM
|
#12
|
|
Prolific Writer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 224
|
I recently read A Clockwork Orange. Very good book. I am proud to say I can still speak nadsat (teenage Russian hooligan slang, as I call it). I govoreet a malenky bit of nadsat real like horrorshow, O My Brothers.
__________________
A bit of advice for my fellow human beings: Read Jane Eyre!
|
|
|
08-02-2007, 12:47 AM
|
#13
|
|
Wordsmith
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On islands
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,706
|
Quote:
|
The film version of "A Clockwork Orange," is very Kubrick-esque; Disturbing. Grim. The book is actually pretty funny.
|
How long since you saw the movie. It has a lot of funny stuff and would hesitate to call it "grim". The William Tell Overture Scene alone.... Kubrick couldn't have known that nowadays everybody can slow it down.
And how about the Swan Lake rape?
Or the guard smiling when Alex can't get it up for the demo model?
It's a richly comic film.
Warning, Hack. Wanting Seed is by no means the quality or level of excitement that Clockwork Orange is. But you might give it a peek and see what you think.
I still bandy nadsat around myself, Elizabeth. It was a common jargon for my brothers and I. But it's actually ENGLISH hooligan slang. Burgess explains that the Russian words like "horosho" for good enter the language subliminally from Russian propoganda broadcasts.
Last edited by lin : 08-02-2007 at 12:50 AM.
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 09:33 AM
|
#14
|
|
Addict
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wolverhampton, UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 176
|
This is currently in a pile of books on my window sill that I am planning to read over summer. We have the film which I have yet to see, partly because I am uncomfortable with rape scenes in film, but for some reason I can cope with it in books.
I'm looking forward to reading it next.
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 12:53 PM
|
#15
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South-east UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,697
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triquediqual
Was the movie just made to horrify people??
|
I'd stick to cartoons and books with really short words. Like join-the-dots.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM. Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
|
|
Newsletter |
 |
|
Subscribe to Majestic the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
|
|
Link to Us:
|
|