|
Okay, now that we have finished the book, let's go ahead and skip the discussion of just the second half, and consider the work as a whole, shall we? (alright Kinbote, now you can go! lol)
Probably, the most rudimentary measure of a complete story would be whether or not the protagonist has experienced a profound change of some kind. In Meursault's case, would this be considered true? Has his character been fundamentally changed by the events in the story? And, if so, has the change been positive, or negative (as far as a conventional measure is concerned)?
__________________
Suffer the little children...
|