Truth-Teller

Harry Potter is not literature.

Stop daydreaming, folks. [-o<

valeca

According to the definition of literature, it is.

Whether or not you like it is a different matter entirely.

__________________
You know you wanna.

Raging_Hopeful

My daydreams are usually composed of your dismemberment TT. But I mean that in the sweetest way possible... kinda.

__________________

JoannaMac

I think what you want to say is that Harry Potter doesn't qualify as good literature, and that people should stop making such a big hoo ha about it because it's completely unworthy. How's that?

__________________
If you aint got nuffink, you can't lose it!

ClancyBoy

Do we really need another Harry Potter thread?

__________________
"Mother Hitton's Littul Kittons wait for you down there. Little pets they are, little little little pets. Cute little things, they say. Don't you believe it. No man ever saw them and walked away alive. You won't either. That's the final dash, flash. That's the utter clobber, cobber." --Cordwainer Smith, Norstrillia.

meldy

LOL. Funny.....and sadly probably true.

I have read the HP books and I never viewed them as literature.

Mira

Uhm, then I'm really confused about the definition of the word literature... I mean, it is a book, that follows a story line. How is it not literature?

meldy

I think I still associate the word "literature" with "classic literature".

Its a bit of a vague definition really.

By that definition Dr.Suess is literature.......comic books are literature.

__________________
I thought about building you a raft to survive the river of tears I am crying for you but the worlds smallest violins just arent a realible source of lumber. And that cross you are nailing yourself to seems bouyant enough anyway- G. House.

Mira

Well, I personally think that anything you can read is literature. Well, anything that comes in book-form really. I mean, not labels on food. But books, comics, maybe even magazines....

JoannaMac

Good point. That's it, I refuse to post on any more threads concerning Harry Potter.

__________________
If you aint got nuffink, you can't lose it!

raven hope

Yeah.

It's time to move on to other better literatures.

__________________


Chronicles of a Legend+...魔境云说+CROSS...

Mike C

Depends on your definition. I prefer this one:

Written works of fiction and nonfiction in which compositional excellence and advancement in the art of writing are higher priorities than are considerations of profit or commercial appeal.

Although take that to its logical conclusion and one would have to assume that success of the writer is in inverse proportion to the excellence of the writing; and from there, that the less publishable a book is, the more literate it must therefore be. Some truth in the first half...

__________________
My writing
Photography
Web design for Writers
The Oddville Press

Dawnstorm

I don't much like this definition, as it's quite hard to apply.

First, who gets their word in? Is this about author's intention? Publisher's intention? Reader's perception?

Take the Potter-books. I doubt Rowling puts marketability over what she considers important. I also doubt she's out to advance the art of writing or to achieve compositional excellence (although she does appear to be willing to learn; the first chapter of book 7 is a well written as the next-to last is atrocious - statement of taste involved). From both books and interview I'd argue that the priority, for Rowling, is story telling.

She's not making Bloom's Canon and I can see why not (though he's overshooting his mark and missing the point, I feel).

Will Harry Potter still be around in, say, sixty years? Ask me again in sixty years.

galt

If it isn't, I want nothing to do with literature.



Harry Potter is the greatest book ever written.

__________________
"Who is John Galt?"
- Altas Shrugged

Hodge

This must mean Shakespeare isn't literature. Or a lot of the classics, really.

__________________
Science