Writers Forum - WritingForums.com Home Rules FAQ Members Groups Calendar Gallery Search
» Sign Up «

Welcome to Writing Forums, one of the fastest growing writing communties on the web.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will be able to talk with other writers, get feedback on your work to improve your writing skills, discuss ideas, share tips & tricks, network and make friends!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
  Search Forums
Lit.Org - Bootcamp for writers. Post your work and other writers review it, it's that easy.

Advanced Search



Go Back   Writers Forum - WritingForums.com > Reading > Books & Authors
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Books & Authors Recommended and not so recommended reading.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-16-2004, 05:20 PM   #1
Addict
 
Stacy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Gender: Female
Posts: 196
Stacy
Women's Literature

I just finished an American Romanticism course where my professor mixed the canonical works (Hawthorne, Melville, Poe, etc.) with some female writers of the time period who experienced a loss in popularity or merely failed to achieve canon status. Some of the books, I could understand why they never achieved literary status ("The Lamplighter" by Maria Susanna Cummins, for example, is extraordinarily awful) but other books were as amazing as Hawthorne or Melville's works. One book in particular really impressed me. This is "The Amber Gods and Other Stories" by Harriet Prescott Spofford. It's wonderfully complex and has the most amazing language I've read in a while.

So, a few questions: Has anyone read Spofford? Have you ever discovered a long forgotten author, male or female, that most people have never heard of? How do you feel about women's lit? Is a waste of time bringing up old works simply because they were written by women, or is it giving a second chance to authors who were not taken seriously in their time due to their sex?
Stacy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2004, 12:08 AM   #2
Ink Slinger
 
lisajane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne Australia
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,065
lisajane is an unknown quantity at this point
I've never heard of Spofford. I don't think it's a waste of time at all to bring up old works by women and it gives the opporunity for us to respect them, for I'm sure several old works by women are execellent rivals for old works by men. If we didn't read the old works by women and just read ones by men, then we're just as bad as what it was like back then - we won't take women seriously again simply due to their sex.
__________________
'Beauty stands and waits with gravity to start her death-defying leap. And he, a little charleychaplin man, who may or may not catch her fair eternal form spreadeagled in the empty air of existence.' - Laurence Felinghetti, 'The Acrobat'
lisajane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.
Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0


 
You are NOT Logged In.
User Name:

Password



Newsletter

Subscribe to Majestic
the official newsletter of Writing Forums and lit.org
Email:


Related Links

Link to Us:
Writing Forums - Discussions for Writers